ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court is expected to hear on Tuesday identical petitions filed by various bar associations against the ongoing sit-ins on Constitution Avenue.

A five-judge larger bench headed by Chief Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk is likely to consider three tricky questions highlighted by Senator Raza Rabbani, representing the Awami National Party and Balochistan National Party-Awami, accusing the leaders of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf and Pakistan Awami Tehreek of using the name of the armed forces during speeches at their protests.

On Sept 10, the court, which had already restrained the state authorities from acting in any manner unwarranted by the Constitution and the law, had asked the PTI and PAT to respond to the questions raised by Senator Rabbani.

The questions are: whether any political party or group may seek constitutional office-bearers to disengage from their offices under threat of violence in violation of the Constitution; whether any political leader can legitimately involve the Pakistan Army in his design to achieve unconstitutional objectives by attempting to reassure his followers that it will determine the course of his action; and whether a leader may misrepresent the support of army to his cause in public or private communication, thereby compromising its image.

Both parties have submitted their replies with the PAT, represented by Advocate Ali Zafar, rejecting the allegation of misrepresenting support of the army to its cause in public and declaring that it was neither permissible under the law nor ethics. The PAT also demanded withdrawal of what it called a wanton assertion attributed to it by the two parliamentary parties.

Barrister Yousuf Khosa, representing the PTI, said he did not have the benefit of knowledge of the facts giving rise to the questions and therefore, was unable to specifically respond to any apprehension that the petitioner parties had.

Right activist Asma Jehangir is likely to represent the Supreme Court Bar Association’s chief Kamran Murtaza in the case.

Published in Dawn, September 21th, 2014

Opinion

A state of chaos

A state of chaos

The establishment’s increasingly intrusive role has further diminished the credibility of the political dispensation.

Editorial

Bulldozed bill
Updated 22 May, 2024

Bulldozed bill

Where once the party was championing the people and their voices, it is now devising new means to silence them.
Out of the abyss
22 May, 2024

Out of the abyss

ENFORCED disappearances remain a persistent blight on fundamental human rights in the country. Recent exchanges...
Holding Israel accountable
22 May, 2024

Holding Israel accountable

ALTHOUGH the International Criminal Court’s prosecutor wants arrest warrants to be issued for Israel’s prime...
Iranian tragedy
Updated 21 May, 2024

Iranian tragedy

Due to Iran’s regional and geopolitical influence, the world will be watching the power transition carefully.
Circular debt woes
21 May, 2024

Circular debt woes

THE alleged corruption and ineptitude of the country’s power bureaucracy is proving very costly. New official data...
Reproductive health
21 May, 2024

Reproductive health

IT is naïve to imagine that reproductive healthcare counts in Pakistan, where women from low-income groups and ...