Indian police rearrest hunger striker

Published August 22, 2014
Indian rights activist Irom Sharmila, who has been on hunger strike for fourteen years, reacts while surrounded by media following her release from a hospital jail in Imphal, capital of the northeastern Manipur state. — Photo by AFP
Indian rights activist Irom Sharmila, who has been on hunger strike for fourteen years, reacts while surrounded by media following her release from a hospital jail in Imphal, capital of the northeastern Manipur state. — Photo by AFP

NEW DELHI: Indian police on Friday rearrested a woman who has been on hunger strike for 14 years to protest against rights abuses, just two days after she was released on the orders of a court.

Television footage showed officers forcibly removing Irom Sharmila, known as the Iron Lady of Manipur for her unwavering and non-violent protest.

“A group of women police arrived at the makeshift protest venue and forcibly took her away,” local activist Janaki Devi told AFP.

"They said she was arrested for refusing to eat, which according to authorities is tantamount to attempted suicide."

Police said she would be taken to a prison hospital in Imphal, the capital of northeastern Manipur state, and force fed via nasal drip.

“We cannot let her die,” a senior police official told AFP on condition of anonymity.

Sharmila began her hunger strike in November 2000 after witnessing the army kill 10 people at a bus stop near her home in Manipur, which is subject to the draconian Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA).

AFSPA, which covers large parts of northeastern India and the restive state of Kashmir, gives Indian forces sweeping powers to search, enter property and shoot on sight, and is seen by critics as a cover for human rights abuses.

She was released from the prison hospital on Wednesday, a day after a Manipur court ruled that a longstanding criminal charge against her of attempting suicide was unsustainable.

The lower sessions court ruled that the fast by Sharmila, who insists she is not trying to take her own life, is a “political protest through lawful means”.

However, the court said in Tuesday's judgment that the state government “may take appropriate measures for her health and safety” such as continuing with feeding her through her nose if she continues to fast.

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...