UK nears decision on ex-Barclays bankers

Published August 16, 2014
As the credit crisis raged in 2008, Barclays avoided a state bailout by securing almost 12 billion pounds from two emergency cash injections. — Photo by AFP
As the credit crisis raged in 2008, Barclays avoided a state bailout by securing almost 12 billion pounds from two emergency cash injections. — Photo by AFP

LONDON: Britain’s fraud prosecutor could decide as soon as next month whether to charge former Barclays executives over undisclosed payments the bank made to Qatari investors in 2008, three sources familiar with the investigation said.

In a two-year investigation the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has interviewed former chief executives Bob Diamond and John Varley, former finance director Chris Lucas, former tax advisory boss Roger Jenkins and other Barclays staff.

Barclays and a spokesman for Diamond declined to comment. Varley, Lucas and Jenkins could not be reached or did not respond to requests for comment.

The SFO has not specified why it is investigating the payments Barclays made to Qatar Holdings when the Qatari sovereign wealth fund invested in the bank. SFO head David Green would only say: “We are making progress with this case, and we are not going away.”

The sources said the agency was expected to decide by late-September or October whether to charge any of the men, after examining its evidence to determine whether there is a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is in the public interest.

If charged, these would be the most senior bankers prosecuted to date for alleged crimes during the 2007-08 financial crisis, which brought the global financial system to its knees and plunged much of the world into recession.

As the credit crisis raged in 2008, Barclays, unlike rivals Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds, avoided a state bailout — and the restrictions that would have come with it — by securing almost 12 billion pounds ($20bn) from two emergency cash injections, mostly from Middle East investors.

But the deal came at a cost.

As part of the deal, Barclays revealed 116 million pounds in advisory fees and commission to Qatar Holdings, but Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said it had failed to reveal another 322m pounds in two “advisory services agreements” with the Qatari company.

The FCA said the non-disclosure was “reckless” and could have broken the bank’s duty to act with integrity to all its shareholders. It fined the bank 50m pounds.

Barclays said it had disclosed one of the agreements, but not the value, and is contesting the FCA findings.

Published in Dawn, August 16th , 2014

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.
Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....