MELBOURNE: Rafael Nadal has the opportunity to add another chapter to his storied career, and intensify an already robust debate, should he beat Stanislas Wawrinka in Sunday’s Australian Open final.

A victory would make the Spanish left-hander the third man to win all four Grand Slam titles twice, joining Australians Rod Laver and Roy Emerson, and also draw him level with Pete Sampras on 14 career major titles.

It would also leave him three behind Wawrinka’s compatriot Roger Federer, who Nadal beat in the semi-finals, and would no doubt generate another round of debate as to who can justifiably be called the greatest player of all time.

“Is there one greatest player of all time?” Sampras replied when asked by reporters if Nadal or Federer could be labelled with that mantle. “I believe when you look at the history of the game, each decade has their player.

“Certainly Roger has been the best player for the last 10 years. Rafa is up there with him. [Novak] Djokovic is pushing. So it’s really hard to say.”

Both sides have a strong case in the Nadal v Federer debate.

Fans of the Swiss suggest Nadal’s record is skewed by his claycourt dominance over the years, while the Spaniard’s supporters point to his 23-10 head-to-head record over Federer.

If Nadal does beat Wawrinka, however, it is inevitable the question will be asked whether he can achieve what no man has done since Laver in 1969 and win a calendar Grand Slam.

Few would bet against him winning his ninth French Open title in early June. He has lost just one match — to Robin Soderling in the fourth round in 2009 — at the claycourt Grand Slam since 2005.

And the manner in which he accounted for 17-times Grand Slam winner Federer, who had looked back to his fluid best at Melbourne Park after a dismal 2013, suggests he will be hard to beat at Wimbledon and the US Open.

Nadal, who has played the tournament with strapping across his left hand due to a painful blister, is only focused on the challenge posed by the 28-year-old Wawrinka.

“He’s playing better than ever ... he’s a player that is ready to win against everybody,” Nadal said. “If I don’t play my best tennis ... I don’t have [a] chance to beat him.”

Nadal holds a 12-0 career record over Wawrinka but he has every reason to be concerned about the challenge from the quietly spoken Swiss, who has found a new level of consistency and seems confident he can reach the upper echelon of the men’s game.

After a stunning run in Melbourne, Wawrinka has a new nickname: The Stanimal — a tribute to his gritty, fight-until-the end style of tennis.

“For me, if you play in a Grand Slam final that’s a different kind of match than I played against him in the past,” Nadal said.

Wawrinka pushed Djokovic to five-sets in both the Australian and US Open last year — the latter was in his first Grand Slam semi-final — which capped off a year in which scored eight wins against top-10 opponents, the third-best total on the ATP Tour.

Wawrinka started 2014 by winning his fifth career title at Chennai and then beat world number two Djokovic, again in five sets, in the quarter-finals at Melbourne Park, ending a 14-match losing streak to the Serb.

He handily beat seventh Tomas Berdych in the semi-finals.

On the eve of the final, Wawrinka said he was still shocked by his success.

“It’s insane. It’s incredible,” the 28-year-old Wawrinka said Saturday, speaking to reporters in English and in his native French. “I never imagined that one day I would be here, playing in the final.”

While Wawrinka faces a tough task to grab his first ever win over Nadal in a Grand Slam final, the Swiss is confident of his ability under Swedish coach Magnus Norman.

Also in Wawrinka’s favour is that Norman was the coach of Soderling when the Swede upset Nadal at the 2009 French Open.

“The record is not what I’m looking at. I’ve played him so many times, and lost so many times, but I’m going to try again,” he said.

“But it’s more about playing Rafa. He’s the number one, the best player. His game is quite tough for me, especially with the one-hand backhand.

“But I had some good matches against him last year.

I will have a few things that I will try tomorrow.”—Agencies

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...