Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper

Daily SectionMarker



Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald

Archive, Search

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Mahir Ali Kamran Shafi The Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

December 19, 2008 Friday Zilhaj 20, 1429


HYDERABAD: Court issues notices to Hesco CEO, others



By Our Staff Correspondent


HYDERABAD, Dec 18: The Hyderabad circuit bench of the Sindh High Court on Thursday issued notices to the chief executive officer of the Hyderabad Electric Supply Company and a number of other officials, asking them to appear in court on Jan 13 on an application filed by a clerk of the company, Jalaluddin Rajput.

Mr Rajput who was represented by Ejaz Ali Hakro advocate sought the court to restrain the respondents from appointing a revenue officer (BPS-17) in the company till it gave a final decision on the contempt of court application against the former CEO Khwaja Maqbool Ahmed and Zafar Iqbal Awan, director of Hesco’s human resources and administration.

The applicant filed an affidavit, mentioning that he had moved the petition in March 2006, praying the court to direct the respondents to consider his representation for appointment ad RO and decide it on merit.

He said that he was fit for the post but the officials delayed decision on his representation despite the fact that they had undertook before the court that they would dispose it of on merit.

The court then disposed of the petition on Feb 15, 2007, directing that the representation should be decided within two months, he and added that he then applied for the post of RO but the respondents again failed to comply with the court order, forcing him to file a contempt of court application which was pending decision.

He said that the respondents conducted written tests for the post and he appeared in them but they did not announce the result nor informed him anything about them.

The respondents again invited applications for the post of RO on Dec 15, 2007.

He moved the court, which stayed announcement of results of interview on March 10, 2008 through an interim order. The order was still in operation, he said.

But the respondents advertised the post for the third time in sheer violation of court orders, he said.







Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

RSS Feed

Newsletters

DAWN Logo

News on Mobile

e-paper print replica


The DAWN Media Group

| About Us | Advertising info | Subscription | Feedback | Contributions | Privacy Policy | Help | Contact us |