9/11 accused Khalid pleads guilty

Published December 9, 2008

GUANTANAMO BAY, Dec 8: Alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and co-defendants said on Monday that they would plead guilty to terror charges.

“The accused in this case have decided that they wish to withdraw all motions... and enter confession pleas,” said Col Stephen Henley, the judge of the military tribunal at the US naval base, in pre-trial proceedings.

He read out a letter submitted by Khalid Sheikh and others, stating that they wished to dismiss their tribunal-appointed defence attorneys and plead guilty to the terror charges.

When asked by the judge if he was prepared to enter pleas on Monday to all the charges should the commission allow the defendants to withdraw their motions, Khalid Sheikh said: “Yes, surely. We don’t want to waste time.” He appeared before the court dressed in white and wearing a white turban, with a long grey and black beard.

“I don’t appreciate between the judge and my attorney and (US President George W.) Bush and the CIA who tortured me,” he said, adding that he also did not trust Col Henley.

Khalid Sheikh, captured in Pakistan in 2003 and handed over to US agents who held him in secret prisons for over three years before sending him to the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, is known to have been subjected to harsh treatment by the CIA, including “water boarding,” or simulated drowning, leading to controversy about the admissibility of his reported confession.

The judge also allowed defendants Walid bin Attash and Ali Abdul Aziz Ali to withdraw all their motions and go to pleas, but refused to allow the same for two other defendants on concerns they were not mentally competent.

“The law compels me to order some additional testing” on the mental competency of Mustafa Al Hawsawi,” he said after the defendant’s US-appointed lawyer requested a medical evaluation.

“Once that testing is completed, we may be able to proceed with your request to represent yourself, withdraw all motions and enter pleas to the charges.”

The fifth defendant, Ramzi bin Al Shibh, had also requested to waive all his motions and go straight to the plea phase but had his request refused, pending a mental competency evaluation.

The five — all formally charged in June —were watched at the tribunal proceedings by five relatives of those killed on 9/11.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...
Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...