Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper

Daily SectionMarker



Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald

Archive, Search

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Mahir Ali Kamran Shafi The Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

September 25, 2008 Thursday Ramazan 24, 1429


KARACHI: Two men acquitted in drug case



By Ishaq Tanoli


KARACHI, Sept 24: The special court for control of narcotic substances on Wednesday acquitted two alleged drug-peddlers due to a lack of incriminating evidence in a case registered against them in August 2004.

Mohammad Farooq and Mohammad Islam were charged with possessing 40 kilos of charas (hashish) each.

Judge Rubina Khan of the CNS-II pronounced the judgment after recording final arguments from both sides.

The prosecution said that a team of the Anti-Narcotic Force, acting on a tip-off, had intercepted a motorcycle near Karachi University on Aug 27, 2004. The team recovered 40 kilos of charas from each accused and arrested them. A case (FIR No 15/2004) was registered against them under Section 6/9-C of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997. Both the accused were later remanded in judicial custody.

Earlier, in his final arguments, the special public prosecutor submitted that the prosecution had successfully proved the involvement of the accused in the case by providing sufficient evidence.

The defence counsel, Shaukat Hayat, said that four defence witnesses were produced in court to prove that his clients were innocent and implicated in the case. However, only three prosecution witnesses, who were the personnel of Anti-Narcotics Force, were produced in court during the last four years, he said, adding that their statements had obvious contradictions. Besides, he said the prosecution did not produce any solid evidence against the accused in court. He pleaded for the acquittal of his clients.

The judge observed that the prosecution had failed to produce ample evidence in court to prove the suspects’ involvement in the case. Besides, there were glaring contradictions in the statements of the prosecution witnesses.

The judge directed the jail authorities to release the accused if they were not wanted in any other case.







Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

RSS Feed

Newsletters

DAWN Logo

News on Mobile

e-paper print replica


The DAWN Media Group

| About Us | Advertising info | Subscription | Feedback | Contributions | Privacy Policy | Help | Contact us |