Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald

Archive, Search

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Mahir Ali Kamran Shafi The Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

May 28, 2008 Wednesday Jamadi-ul-Awwal 22, 1429



Australian troops ashamed of their low-risk missions



By Lawrence Bartlett


SYDNEY: Australian infantry soldiers are ashamed of their low-risk missions in Iraq and Afghanistan and are scorned by troops of other nations, two seasoned officers charged in comments published on Tuesday.

“The restrictions and policies enforced on infantrymen in Iraq have resulted in the widespread perception that our army is plagued by institutional cowardice,” Major Jim Hammett wrote in the Australian Army Journal.

Australia under the conservative government of former prime minister John Howard contributed troops to the US-led invasion and occupation of Iraq, but their roles have been limited.

Howard prided himself on being a staunch US ally in the so-called “war on terror”, however, and President George W. Bush called him a “man of steel” over his troop commitment even when the occupation began to go awry.

While Australia had received “significant political kudos” for its support of coalition operations in Iraq and Afghanistan this was not reflected among troops on the battlefields, Hammett said in the official journal.

“Australia’s contributions to both Iraq and Afghanistan have been derided and scorned by soldiers and officers alike from other nations who are more vigorously engaged in combat operations,” Hammett, who has served in Iraq, Somalia and East Timor, wrote in the latest edition.

“The restrictions placed on deployed elements as a result of force protection and national policies have, at times, made infantrymen ashamed of wearing their Australian uniform.” No Australian soldiers have been killed in combat in Iraq, while more than 4,000 US soldiers have died in Iraq since the March 2003 invasion.

In a separate article, Captain Greg Colton said infantry troops were increasingly frustrated because special forces appeared to be favoured for offensive operations while they were set “second-rate operational tasks”.

Five Australian soldiers, mainly special forces commandos, have been killed in Afghanistan since 2002.

Australian army chief Lieutenant-General Peter Leahy told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that he understood some soldiers wanted “a bit more of a go”, but they had to understand the nature of war had changed.

“This is no longer infantry wearing red jackets and white cross straps, taking on the army of another king,” he said.

‘What we’re seeing now is that we’re required to work in different populations to work to protect, to support and persuade.

“I know that the infantry have real basic skills, that they can do that traditional role of seek ... and kill and destroy. But we’re not asking for that at the moment, that’s not the environment we’re in.” The new centre-left Labour government led by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, which was elected last November, has pledged to pull Australia’s 550-strong battle group from southern Iraq by the middle of this year.—AFP







Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

RSS Feed

Newsletters

DAWN Logo

News on Mobile

e-paper print replica


The DAWN Media Group

| About Us | Advertising info | Subscription | Feedback | Contributions | Privacy Policy | Help | Contact us |