Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather


FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Mahir Ali Kamran Shafi The Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

November 17, 2007 Saturday Ziqa’ad 06, 1428







Caretaker set-up’s neutrality questioned



By Our Reporter


ISLAMABAD, Nov 16: A coalition of 30 civil society organisations advocating for electoral and democratic reforms has expressed its concern over the process and composition of the caretaker set-up installed to oversee the executive function of the state until the general elections scheduled for January next year are held.

In a statement issued here, Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN) stressed that the neutrality of the caretaker government was vital for free and fair elections.

Article 224, clause 7 of the Constitution also clearly specifies the fact that neither the caretaker prime minister nor the caretaker chief ministers shall be eligible to contest the elections.

A caretaker set-up comprising personalities who are either politically affiliated or have a stake in the results of upcoming elections is contrary to the concept of neutrality. Caretaker governments are constituted in consultation with all stakeholders in order to create a greater legitimacy of election and its results.

It, however, observed that the caretaker government comprises many names who have known affiliations with a political party. The caretaker prime minister himself was elected to the chairman of the Senate with the support of the then ruling party, which is now an election contender. He has yet to relinquish his post as Senate chairman.

In addition there are some other affiliates of the same political party who have been inducted into the caretaker cabinet. Some of them continue to retain the elected offices, which they had won as the candidate of the then ruling party.

A politically partisan caretaker set-up has the potential of impeding a free election that requires robust competition among candidates in which the electorate is well-informed about candidates’ differing platforms or viewpoints.

A real political campaign can only be held in an environment with equitable access to open media, a “playing field” not dominated by the incumbent government, and security provided equally to all competitors by the state so that voters do not fear attending political events.

There has also not been any consultation with all political parties on the composition of the caretaker set-up. Fafen has already argued in favour of a government comprising neutral, non-political and impeccable personalities that enjoy confidence of all political parties as well as opposition parties for the interim period. It should be selected through a process of nomination by all stakeholders.

While elections under emergency run contrary to best election practices around the world, a caretaker set-up comprising politically affiliated personalities put together without broad- based consultations with political parties will compromise the integrity of elections.

Fafen recommended that all political parties must immediately be consulted, either through a roundtable conference or through any other well-elaborated, transparent consultative process, organised to make adequate changes in the caretaker set-up in case there is an emerging consensus regarding the neutrality of any member of the caretaker set-up.






Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007