Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather


FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

October 22, 2007 Monday Shawwal 9, 1428







Policemen facing cases still enjoying ‘job’


GUJRANWALA, Oct 21: The Sadar SHO and an ASI, who were booked on court orders earlier for keeping three people in illegal confinement at the police station a few days ago and later intimidating the complainant to stop prosecuting the case, are still working on their slots and the department has not taken any action so far.

The complainant of the case, Muhammad Arshad, told Dawn on Sunday that the delinquent policemen were neither being interrogated nor had been told to report at the Police Lines after relinquishing their charge despite registration of two consecutive cases.

The complaint said SHO inspector Riaz Hadari and ASI Bahadar Shah picked his three relatives — Asif, Yousaf and Sadiq — from their houses and detained them at the police station illegally.

A court bailiff under the directives of the district and sessions judge raided the police station and recovered the confined men and later produced them in the court. The sessions judge freed them and ordered registration of a case against the SHO and the ASI for keeping them in illegal confinement.

The complainant alleged that despite registration of the case, no action was taken against the SHO and the ASI and instead they started intimidating him to stop pursuing the case.

The complainant said he again moved the court on which sessions judge ordered registration of another case against the SHO and the ASI for intimidating and threatening him.

Both the SHO and the ASI are still working on their seats as they were prior to the registration of both the cases. The complainant said the department was bound to initiate disciplinary action against them under the Police Rules, 1934, as well as Police Order, 2002, but nothing such had happened so far.

He appealed to the sessions judge and DIG (Operations) Khadim Hussain Bhattti to provide him justice. — Correspondent






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007