Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
DAWN - the Internet Edition


September 08, 2007 Saturday Sha'aban 25, 1428


Editorial


PML-Q in its labyrinth
Condoning the plagiarists
Rape in a Karachi hospital
The ‘orphan’ disease
Khaleda Zia arrested
President Iajuddin to stay on



PML-Q in its labyrinth


CONVINCED now of its own mortality, what was once the brash and cocksure king’s party is in a state of panic. It is not, however, in denial. The dirges sung today by the PML-Q are in fact a far more honest take on reality than the bombast of recent years. In that sense at least, the opportunists that are the lifeblood of the PML-Q ought to be commended for dropping all pretence and admitting, perhaps not in so many words, that their political worth sans the patronage of GHQ is close to nil. In an arena dominated by hypocrisy and delusions of grandeur, the PML-Q is being remarkably candid and down to earth these days. Its leaders admit freely that the Musharraf-PPP deal (read Musharraf-Benazir, for the party is secondary in these parleys) may lead to the “demise” of the PML-Q. The hangers-on from Sindh feel that the PML-Q as it stands today in the province could “disintegrate” if the PPP is given the “upper hand”. Never mind that ‘upper hand’ in this context may be nothing more nefarious than a level playing field. In short, the PML-Q is acknowledging what has been known all along and what has long made it a laughing stock amongst the public: the king’s party is a circus act, conjured out of a military ruler’s beret and lacking even a leg to stand on when deprived of the presidential prop.

A handful among those clinging to the general’s coat-tails may be able to win a fair election through clan clout but the rest are destined for the recycling bin, if not the dustbin of history. They could, however, resort to jumping ship and throwing themselves at the mercy of the PPP or the PML led by Nawaz Sharif. Some stellar turncoats, like Faisal Saleh Hayat, can’t take comfort even in that prospect. Barring miracles, they will sink with the ship. The PML-Q’s woes don’t end there. As reportedly pointed out by Sheikh Rasheed, wily to the last, the PPP may be the least of the party’s problems. The PML-N is riding a high it hasn’t known for almost a decade and seems willing to readmit to its fold all PML-Q parliamentarians who agree not to vote for Gen Musharraf in the presidential election. Reverting loyalties to the parent party rather than approaching the PPP may be a far less awkward prospect for many PML-Q legislators, and this is not lost on the Chaudhrys and other top government officials. Legislators aside, grassroots workers may also switch sides.

The best hope for the PML-Q leadership may lie in somehow seeking a postponement of the elections. Some of their top leaders have already hinted at it.. After all, an election schedule is yet to be announced. At best they may be able to piece together another year or so in office, to carry on doing whatever they’ve done in the last five years. But even that is unlikely for the tide has turned in no uncertain manner, and not just because of the pressure Washington is bringing to bear on Gen Musharraf. The charade of engineered democracy has run its course and the people of Pakistan want change.

Top



Condoning the plagiarists


NOTHING seems to have convinced the Punjab University that it needs to take strict action against its teachers found guilty of plagiarism, not even the prospect of losing a stable source of funding. On Wednesday, the university announced its annual budget of Rs2.83bn without taking into account the fact that it will not get any funds from the Higher Education Commission unless it takes stern action against the plagiarists. Since the allegations of plagiarism first surfaced in April 2006 against five teachers of the university’s Centre for High Energy Physics, the commission has been demanding disciplinary action against the plagiarists because they had damaged the educational and scientific environment in the country as well as Pakistan’s image abroad. As a measure to get things done as it had desired, the commission last year withheld Rs104m earmarked for the Punjab University. No matter how desperately drastic the step looked, it failed to convince the university authorities that the issue was too serious to let it pass.

Ignoring the message that this withholding was intended to convey, the university remains adamant and believes that the commission will still be willing to finance 31 per cent of its budget for 2007-08. Even if denied the sum — as is expected because of the commission’s zero-tolerance policy towards plagiarism — the university does not seem to care less. It claims that it has other means of overcoming the shortfall, one of them being a Rs500m promised grant from the Punjab government. There is no grudging the university’s ability to raise the money it needs for its annual budget but this should not become an excuse for letting the plagiarists off the hook, not the least because it will set a bad precedent for other institutions of higher learning. In fact, the university had acknowledged in a meeting of its syndicate held in April that any decision taken against the plagiarists “would serve as a landmark case relating to ethical writing practices and research”. But then the syndicate ended up handing down very mild punishments. Given the autonomy the Punjab University enjoys in running its affairs, there is little that the commission can do on the issue other than a refusal to provide funds. Unless the university realises the gravity of the problem, efforts to eradicate plagiarism will not go far enough.

Top



Rape in a Karachi hospital


THE gang rape of a young nurse at a hospital in Karachi on Thursday by four ward attendants tells us no place is safe from grisly attacks. The nurse who works at Civil Hospital had gone to a government hospital in her residential locality for some treatment when she was assaulted by four ward men. Miraculously, she went to the police to report the crime. Unfortunately an officer’s response — he said that she appeared mentally unbalanced because she walked into the police station with a vegetable basket — is also a reminder of how much sensitivity is needed in handling crimes against women. A medical examination has confirmed assault so this shows that some progress has been made in speeding up the investigative procedure. It is not uncommon for rape victims to suffer a whole host of delays in their pursuit of justice — from difficulties in registering an FIR to delays in the investigative procedure because of the police’s inefficiency or incompetence to delays in the trial itself.

Since the aforementioned suspects have fled along with an attendant who was unable to stop the assault (perhaps he feared torture by the police) one can only hope that the police will leave no stone unturned in their quest to bring them to justice. While it is heartening that more women are stepping forward to report rapes, and discriminatory aspects of the law have been changed to favour them, it is tragic that the government is unable to secure more convictions. For this the police and prosecution have to put forward strong cases against the culprits. No man should feel that he can get away with a crime like rape. Because it is not always possible for a rape victim to go to a women’s police station, policemen need to be sensitised to dealing with the issue.

Top



The ‘orphan’ disease


By Dr Naseem Salahuddin

THE first World Rabies Day is being observed on Sept 8. At long last, rabies has come to be globally accepted as a serious, but neglected, disease of the poor. Ironically, it is the men in power who can control rabies which affects mainly the weaker sections of society which are most vulnerable.

One hopes that this occasion will create awareness of this lethal health problem in Pakistan at all levels of policymaking. The need is basically for a systematic and sustained control programme, sufficient resource mobilisation and allocation and inter-sectoral coordination.

Termed an “orphan” disease, despite its known existence for centuries, rabies has never been given the importance it should have as a serious, 100 per cent fatal infectious disease. Over the past two decades, four WHO regions covering Asia, Africa, the Americas and Eastern Europe have reported an estimated 50,000 to 55,000 rabies deaths annually, 20,000 of these being in India.

It is not generally realised that 40 per cent of rabies cases occur in children in the five to 15 years age group, mostly living in the rural areas. There they are taken to local traditional healers. Given the inevitability of death, most patients prefer to die at home rather than undertake a journey in futility to a distant hospital. Hence no accurate data is available of the incidence of rabies.Pakistan reports an estimated 2,500 rabies deaths per year which works out to 17 per million population. Compare this with 20 in India, four in Sri Lanka, 0.2 in Indonesia and 0.1 in Thailand (per million population). With the exception of India and Pakistan, most other countries have shown a decline in rabies deaths over a decade. This is attributed to improved quality and more widely available post-exposure prophylaxis along with better dog population control.

Mortality figures may not sound impressive to epidemiologists who compute deaths from tuberculosis, AIDS and malaria in the tens of thousands. It is the slow, painful, torturous form of death that evokes profound emotion from the family, community and healthcare givers. The psychological burden of dog-bite can be enormous, the trauma of the horrific death is devastating for the victim’s family.

The lethal virus lives in the saliva of a rabid animal, usually a dog though not all biting dogs carry the virus. A biting animal may not manifest external signs of rabies until a few days after biting the victim. Without testing the animal’s saliva it is impossible to guess the status of the rogue animal. A bite is analogous to playing Russian roulette where a six-chambered revolver with one bullet and five empty chambers is held to the head. When the trigger is pulled, one in six persons will surely die.

Hence the decision to give proper prophylaxis with quality vaccine to almost every dog-bite victim in order to prevent one case of rabies must be made urgently and expertly. Establishing a diagnostic reference laboratory in the public sector would go a long way in reducing unnecessary rabies vaccination.

With Pakistan’s health system as a whole riddled with problems of inadequate infrastructure and manpower, low accessibility and scarce resources, and the majority of people caught in the vicious cycle of poverty, ignorance and deprivations, rabies is unsurprisingly not considered a high priority problem. A case, therefore, needs to be built on the Disability Associated Life Years (DALYs) lost and economic losses of rabies.

The federal ministry of health’s response to this problem has been to mandate the National Institute of Health (NIH) in Islamabad to draw up policies to regulate all aspects of rabies. It has elegantly prepared plans but as is the wont here they have yet to be implemented. Time and again, pleas for replacing the poorly effective, harmful and obsolete sheep brain vaccine (SBV) with safe, effective and modern tissue culture vaccine (TCV) have fallen on deaf ears.

Pakistan, Myanmar, Bangladesh and Vietnam are the only rabies endemic countries in the world which still use SBV. All others have since long switched to the TCV, the proper use of which has greatly reduced the incidence of the disease. India is now one of the world’s largest vaccine exporters. Our plea to the ministry of health is to abandon SBV and import WHO-validated TCV at a competitive cost.

The vaccine can be produced in Pakistan, provided good manufacturing practices are adopted. NIH’s previous experiment in producing TCV ended in deaths of dog-bite victims who were injected with the vaccine. That is because the facilities and expertise were inadequate and these failures should be guarded against.

The thrust should, of course, be on prevention. By controlling the animal population that is responsible for the transmission of rabies, the disease in human beings can be eliminated. In rabies-free countries, the ministry of health coordinates closely with the livestock and agriculture authorities and the local governments. In Pakistan, this interaction and collaboration is either minimal or non-existent. As a result, resources are wasted.

The need is to institute a programme for animal birth control and for the vaccination of domestic, community and stray dogs, which is the only proven method of animal rabies control. Under the law, it is mandatory for pet owners to get their animals vaccinated but as is common here there is no enforcement of the law. Ad hoc immunisation of a limited number of dogs, and culling are unsustainable over a period of time and a waste of resources.

The first step in rabies control would be a situational analysis and reliable assessment of annual human and animal rabies deaths, animal bites, geographical distribution and other epidemiological information and data. This would allow us to focus resources on “hot” spots. Along with that, public awareness programmes must be an ongoing process in which the media’s participation must be enlisted.

Subspecialty training in indigenous infectious diseases at levels of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education should be mandatory while TCV should be made available in all district hospitals, and physicians trained in the use of the Thai Red Cross low dose intradermal method of giving vaccine, which reduces the cost of vaccination considerably.

The writer is a consultant in infectious diseases and member of WHO Rabies Expert Committee and President of Rabies in Asia (Pakistan Chapter) Foundation.

Top



Khaleda Zia arrested


Prothom Alo

A FAMILY behind bars. Sad, unfortunate. Security officials arrested former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia on the morning of Sept 3 …on charges of abusing power, corruption and bribe-taking in a case filed by the Anti-Corruption Commission, the country’s graft watchdog.

The same day, her son Arafat Rahman Coco was arrested. Earlier arrested was Tarique Rahman, the elder of Khaleda’s two sons and senior joint secretary-general of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party. The triple arrests mean all family members of the late President Ziaur Rahman — popular and famed for his honesty — are behind bars.

Khaleda and Hasina soared to the popularity of people’s leaders through a democratic movement; people had kept full trust in them. They alternated power for 15 years — the first as prime minister for two terms and the latter for one. The people looked to them for a happy, prosperous, peaceful and democratic Bangladesh, but they failed to live up to expectations as the leaders of the country.

Democracy became dysfunctional. The administration was politicised. Every aspect of society and businesses had been mired in deep corruption. It seemed that nobody would be able to stay beyond the reach of the government’s anti-corruption crackdown. It appeared that the arrest of Khaleda — after the detention of Hasina in jail — was no surprise.

But the government should make sure that the legal procedure for them is fair. The government should make people feel that the two leaders are not politically harassed. The so-called “Minus-2 Formula” fanned speculation that the government was hell-bent on taking the two leaders off the political scene. The government must prove that the two were arrested for the sake of justice — for a legal solution to the charges they have been facing. People want to hold on to their belief that nobody is above the law—however powerful, popular and influential. — (Sept 4)

Top



President Iajuddin to stay on

Samokal


LOST time is lost forever. Bangladesh President Iajuddin Ahmed will stay in office until his successor is elected.The term of the president is five years. There is no constitutional bar on the president to be elected for the second time. But that is not possible — at least for now — as there is no active parliament and the country is run by the caretaker government.

The problem stemmed from a forestalled election. In addition to his job as president, Iajuddin took the reins of the caretaker government to lead the country through the ninth parliamentary election, scheduled for January.

But he stepped down as the chief of the caretaker government under pressure from the Awami League and its allies but retained the ceremonial post of the president. It all happened because of fierce street protests by the so-called mega-alliance led by the Awami League that had accused Iajuddin of bias towards the four-party coalition.

Fakhruddin Ahmed was installed as the new boss of the caretaker government. Efforts are underway to bring reforms to politics and make a new voter list — deemed essential to the election likely to take place by the end of 2008.

This is the reason for an extension of the presidential tenure. We hope that the next election will be held as soon as possible — during the extended tenure of Iajuddin. In the backdrop of a long-running movement for democracy, a parliamentary system of government was put in place in 1991. Democracy seemed to have started taking shape thanks to the three general elections held in time.

The trend snapped in 2006. It should be analysed as to why the ninth parliamentary election was deferred and who was responsible and how much. The rule of Iajuddin as the caretaker government chief for two months and a half in a violent political context could be taken into account. — (Sept 6)

–– Selected and translated by Arun Devnath<\i>

Top



Top of Page





Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007