Comment: Weather and daft officials ruin potentially thrilling finale
By Kamran Abbasi
A WORLD Cup that promised more than it delivered produced a final that played to the same script. A thunderous innings by Adam Gilchrist enticed Sri Lanka to respond valiantly but an ill-timed downpour created fatal confusion among players and umpires as the World Cup final, the showpiece event in international cricket, ended in complete farce.
This tournament has been a disaster from start to finish, from Bob Woolmer's death to this anti-climactic triumph for Australia. The ICC has continued to maintain that the competition has been a success. It should ask the people who matter, the fans.
The stands have been empty, the format flawed, the tournament too long, and the cricket tedious. If that is the ICC's idea of success I would hate to see what failure looks like.
National and international cricket administrators have lost touch with what is important. Despite Australia's commanding position and Gilchrist's stunning innings, Sri Lanka were mounting an exciting challenge for the trophy. A potentially thrilling finale was ruined by the weather and daft officials, robbing Sri Lanka of any realistic possibility of success.
Even so, it would have taken a miraculous performance to overhaul Australia's total. While Sri Lanka did show that it is possible to put this Australian bowling attack under pressure, it is Australia's batting that is on another level to all other countries.
The top six batsmen are skilful, smart, and domineering. Their techniques are finely honed for all-out attack and it is inevitable that one of them will produce a special performance. It must be particularly reassuring to see Adam Gilchrist and Matthew Hayden stride out to open each innings, with the captain and world's best batsmen Ricky Ponting padded up to continue the assault.
In ideal batting conditions, Gilchrist produced a remarkable innings that stole the match from Sri Lanka. All bowlers were alike to him, and once he was settled he began to hit straight and true with astonishing control and power. Some of that control was produced by a squash ball stuffed into his left batting glove, apparently to ease the bottom hand's influence in his stroke-play.
Gilchrist's innings ranks with any of the great World Cup final performances, and was even more extraordinary since none of his fellow batsmen managed to play as freely as he did. Sri Lanka were shell-shocked and lost their bowling discipline. But Gilchrist has a remarkable ability to turn good length balls into short balls and that is when bowlers lose control.
Certainly in my lifetime, there has been no better wicket-keeper batsman than Gilchrist, and it is hard to imagine that anybody could have ever been better. Thanks largely to Gilchrist, the wicket-keeper in modern cricket also has to be a frontline batsman. Otherwise you can forget competing with Australia.
Glenn McGrath is another Australian cricketer who has set new standards. He closed his international career in Barbados with a record third consecutive World Cup triumph, the player of the tournament award, and the highest number of wickets in the competition and World Cup history. The world's batsmen will sleep a little more easily.
Ponting joined McGrath and Gilchrist in picking up three World Cup winners' medals. He leads his team from the front, both with the bat and in the field. He might not be the oldest but he has their respect. It is the professionalism of these three senior cricketers that explains the success of Australian cricket. Nobody remains in the national team on reputation alone. You have to perform consistently at a high level.
And that is where Australia are, on a higher level to all other international teams. They were by far the best team in this tournament and fully deserved to be the 2007 World Cup winners. On the evidence of the past few weeks, the rest of the world is a long way behind the power cricket of Australia.


