Encroachments: the bane of our cities
By Aileen Qaiser
NO city in our country is spared from encroachments and thus anti-encroachment drives, not even our planned and relatively tidier capital city.
The fact that authorities recently had to resort to the drastic action of demolishing illegal constructions (permanent encroachments) in both Islamabad and Rawalpindi makes many wonder if our present anti-encroachment departments are capable of dealing with a problem which is only expected to grow in our fast expanding cities.
In Rawalpindi, five under-construction commercial plazas —three on the main Murree Road and two others in Sadiqabad — said to have been built in violation of the city’s building rules were demolished over the last weekend by the Rawal Town Municipal Administration. The three two-storey plazas on Murree Road were razed because parking lots were not provided for.
About a fortnight ago, six mosques were reportedly demolished in Islamabad as part of the city authorities’ anti-encroachment drive against some 84 mosques which are said to have been illegally constructed, a move which prompted female students of a madressah to forcibly occupy a children’s library in protest.
CDA’s Anti-Encroachment Department had started the demolition campaign against illegal structures in urban areas several months ago. In September 2006 it razed a camp said to have been established illegally near a mosque in sector G-8/1, some 23 makeshift cottages in sector G-11/4, various cattle huts in sector I-11/1 as well as three boundary walls.
Last Friday, some huts in Saidpur Village were reportedly razed to make way for the alignment of a nullah (drain) — part of CDA’s plan to establish a ‘model tourist village’ — prompting the villagers to stage a demonstration seeking compensation in the form of alternative plots in the village.
In the ICT, the encroachment problem is particularly extensive in the non-developed rural areas, especially Tarnol, Sihala, Bhara Kahu and Saidpur. In 2005 CDA had carried out a survey of encroachments in these areas before launching an anti- encroachment operation.
In 2006, CDA set up anti-encroachment checkposts in the rural areas to prevent recurrence of illegal constructions. For this, CDA’s enforcement directorate was strengthened by personnel from the capital police who were supposed to provide guards to man these checkposts.
But while anti-encroachment drives against makeshift temporary structures and movable stalls in the markets and on the roadside can be carried out relatively easily, similar campaigns against permanent structures like mosques or commercial plazas can prove to be quite a daunting task, politically as well as economically.
The operation to remove permanent encroachments is usually a massive one, requiring not only dozens of vehicles, trucks, dumpers and tractors to be used in the bulldozing but also the presence of tens if not hundreds of law enforcers. All this money of the taxpayers is wasted when these encroachments resurface, which is very often the case where slums or katchi abadis are concerned, whether at the same site or elsewhere.
Moreover, razing these illegal structures is also wastage of resources, however, wrong the encroachers may have been in raising these structures where they are not supposed to in the first place. Then there is also further wastage of resources in subsequent long-drawn litigations between the owners and the authorities.
All this wastage of the precious resources of the people and the nation could have been avoided if we had more efficient government agencies, not least of all more authoritative but corruption-free anti-encroachment establishments, to pre-empt the mushrooming of illegal structures in the first place.
No person has the right to encroach but the fact that encroachments often occur and very often are allowed to continue mean that the government agencies have only themselves to blame for the existence of these illegal structures.
This is because illegal structures are usually the result of officials turning a blind eye to encroachments and not taking stern action from the very beginning before the first brick was laid. And the longer the encroachments are allowed to continue to exist, the harder it is to get rid of them.
In the case of the recently demolished plazas in Rawalpindi, their building plans must have been approved by the relevant government departments. In the case of the demolished mosques, electricity, water and even drainage connections must have been approved by the relevant government departments.
In both instances, officials from the anti-encroachment departments should have been there to prevent the first brick of these structures being laid. Thus, unless officials in the various government agencies have the will and courage to act whenever necessary and at the same time these officials are made accountable for their lapses when encroachments come up, illegal structures will continue to be raised in our cities.
Anti-encroachment checkposts would also need to be set up in the capital’s urban areas, where encroachments outside the shops and along the roadside in major markets like Aabpara, Blue Area, etc., are persistent recurring problems. But then these checkposts will only achieve the objective if they do not merely become another opportunity for officials to accept favours and look the other way.
While temporary encroachments like vendors, pushcarts and stalls make the markets crowded and untidy and cause traffic jams on the roads, permanent encroachments like illegal construction foul up urban planning and hamper efficient development.
In many cases, encroachments in our country are also a reflection of not only influence, nepotism and corruption, but the inability or failure of governments to provide the population with the necessary facilities like low cost housing, employment opportunities, etc., thus driving them to resort to encroaching to build a shelter over their heads or to earn a living.
Controlling the growth of encroachments permanently thus requires much more than alert and efficient anti-encroachment departments. It requires a long term multi-pronged approach, the character of each depending on the nature of the encroachment.
Finally, not only are illegal encroachments the bane of urban planning, their presence also reflects the lack of civic sense and respect for the law among the general population. Until and unless we can inculcate the sense of law abidance in people, the lack of which is also responsible for a host of other problems like unruly traffic and rising crimes, encroachments will continue to blight our cities and remain a challenge for the authorities.


