Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

February 04, 2007 Sunday Muharram 15, 1428


KARACHI: SHC order reserved on Beachfront Project



By Our Staff Reporter


KARACHI, Feb 3: A division bench of the Sindh High Court on Saturday reserved its order on a petition against the ‘Beachfront Project’ of the Defence Housing Authority.

The bench, which consisted of Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany and Justice Nadeem Azhar Siddiqui, heard detailed arguments advanced by DHA counsel Makhdoom Ali Khan, resident petitioners’ counsel Jawaid A. Siddiqui and Shehri (an NGO) counsel Rizwana Ismail on Friday and Saturday.

Residents of Seaview Apartments and neighbouring area initially moved the petition to assail the construction of a commercial project over a 13-acre plot earmarked for a public park and a mosque. Shehri joined in the proceedings to challenge the entire Beachfront Project along the coastline. An additional 60,000 square yards was given to M/s Minhal (Pvt) Limited, the contractors, for development of a huge entertainment complex and shopping mall. The project would effectively bar the residents and the general public from the beach, the petitioners maintained.

The DHA counsel argued that the park sanctioned in 2000 was never a part of the authority’s master plan. The public would not be barred from the beach and that the project posed no threat to environment. However, the DHA was prepared to submit the project to the environmental protection agency and seek a no-objection certificate from it.

The petitioners’ counsel argued that the DHA had no master plan and was expanding haphazardly. Once a plot had been earmarked for development of a public park, it could not be put to any other use under a Supreme Court judgment. Public entry to the beach would be restricted. The project would be built over a sewage plant and pollute the whole area along the coastline. They also objected to the principal federal and provincial law officers appearing as DHA counsel in the petition.



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007