PESHAWAR, Jan 9: The Peshawar High Court Bar Association on Tuesday condemned the mining of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, terming it unconstitutional, inhuman and against international treaties.

Through a resolution a meeting of the association requested the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to take suo motu notice of the issue, stating the border mining would result in maiming and killing of innocent people, especially women and children.

Barrister Zahoorul Haq presided over the meeting which was convened on the requisition filed by the FATA Lawyers’ Forum.

The meeting decided that in case the chief justice did not take notice of the matter, members of the Supreme Court Bar Association from Peshawar would challenge it in the apex court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.

The meeting said that the decision taken by the Pakistani government was in violation of The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, commonly known as the Ottawa Convention.

Barrister Zahoorul Haq, Kareem Mehsud, Barrister Bachhaa, Shahabuddin Burq, Taj Mahal Afridi, Ghulam Nabi and Moazam Butt spoke on the occasion.

Majority of the speakers said the decision of the Pakistani government was impracticable and unrealistic as people with the same ethnic background lived on both sides of the Durand Line.

They said that from North and South Waziristan upto Bajaur agencies, the people used to frequently cross the Durand Line as in most of the cases family members had been residing on both sides of the border.

They said that in Waziristan agencies there were people who had been residing on the Afghan side of the border, but they have cultivable land and shops on the Pakistani side.

They said that women and children frequently used to cross the border for collecting fire-wood and they would become victims of landmines known as indiscriminate killers.

They said that the anti-personnel mines did not discriminate between a combatant and non-combatant, between a militant and innocent woman and children.

Criticising General Pervez Musharraf, the meeting said that a single individual had no right to play with the life of thousands of people.

They said that it was unconstitutional to make such vital decisions without the consent of parliament and the people.

Moazam Butt opposed the resolution and walked out of the meeting.

Opinion

Editorial

Tough talks
Updated 16 Apr, 2024

Tough talks

The key to unlocking fresh IMF funds lies in convincing the lender that Pakistan is now ready to undertake real reforms.
Caught unawares
16 Apr, 2024

Caught unawares

PAKISTAN has once again been caught off-guard by the devastating impact of unseasonal and intense rains across its...
Going off track
16 Apr, 2024

Going off track

LIKE many other state-owned enterprises in the country, Pakistan Railways is unable to deliver, while haemorrhaging...
Iran’s counterstrike
Updated 15 Apr, 2024

Iran’s counterstrike

Israel, by attacking Iran’s diplomatic facilities and violating Syrian airspace, is largely responsible for this dangerous situation.
Opposition alliance
15 Apr, 2024

Opposition alliance

AFTER the customary Ramazan interlude, political activity has resumed as usual. A ‘grand’ opposition alliance ...
On the margins
15 Apr, 2024

On the margins

IT appears that we are bent upon taking the majoritarian path. Thus, the promise of respect and equality for the...