Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

December 05, 2006 Tuesday Ziqa'ad 13, 1427


Blair unveils plan to modernise N-arsenal


LONDON, Dec 4: Prime Minister Tony Blair unveiled plans on Monday to modernise Britain's nuclear deterrent, cutting the number of warheads but warning that disarming would be dangerous as new terrorist threats emerge.

While the Cold War was over, he said, states like North Korea and Iran both had “highly dubious” reasons to pursue a nuclear weapons capability, and other rogue states were a distinct reason for Britain to keep its deterrent.

The plans include a new generation of nuclear submarines at a cost of up to 20 billion pounds.

In an apparent concession to critics from within his own party and the anti-nuclear lobby, Mr Blair promised to cut the number of stockpiled nuclear warheads by 20 per cent from about 200 currently to 160.

But he said: “The government's judgment, on balance, is that though the Cold War is over, we cannot be certain in the decades ahead that a major nuclear threat to our strategic interest will not emerge.”

The premier, outlining the government's proposals to retain the US-built Trident missile system to parliament, said there were “new and potentially hazardous” threats from states like North Korea and Iran.

There was no guarantee that “there is a possible connection between some of those states and international terrorism” and that no other nuclear state in the world was considering unilaterally getting rid of its capability, he said.

“In these circumstances, it would be unwise and dangerous for Britain, alone of any of the nuclear powers, to give up its independent nuclear deterrent,” he told the lower House of Commons.

Mr Blair argued that action was needed immediately to take the first steps towards maintaining Trident, because of the estimated 17 years it takes to design build and deploy a new submarine. A new generation of submarines would cost between 15 billion pounds and 20 billion pounds, including design and manufacturing costs, he added.

No decisions were needed on the warheads, as the lifespan of the Trident D5 missile can be extended to 2042, he said.

The prime minister rejected concerns that by retaining Trident, the UK was in breach of its obligations to nuclear non-proliferation.

“We have the smallest stockpile of nuclear warheads amongst the recognised nuclear weapons states, and are the only one to have reduced our stockpile of operationally available warheads to no more than 160, which represents a further 20 per cent,” he said and added: “Compared with previous plans, we will have reduced the number of such weapons by nearly half.”

The issue of replacing Trident is likely to dominate the political agenda in the coming months before a parliamentary vote on the matter in March.

Nuclear weapons are a divisive issue within Blair's governing Labour Party, as unilateral disarmament was a key plank of its policy at the height of the Cold War during the 1980s. But he is unlikely to suffer an embarrassing defeat in parliament.

—AFP






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006