Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition

November 17, 2006 Friday Shawwal 24, 1427


History, lack of trust hold back India-China trade


NEW DELHI: Walk into an Indian market and ask for cheap batteries, or a toy, a shirt or even a portrait of a Hindu god, and chances are the shopkeeper will offer Chinese products with a rider that they are not very reliable.

Talk to senior officials at a top Chinese telecoms company, and ask them about their experience of doing business in India, and you would hear mournful stories of how they were denied deals worth billions of dollars by Indian state firms at the last minute despite having the best bid.

Both are instances that indicate how decades-old mistrust and a lack of understanding between the world's two most populous nations could hurt the scorching pace at which their business links have grown, experts said.

As businesses in India and China, among the world's fastest growing economies, set ambitious targets to push their trade, governments in the two countries need to bury the ghosts of the past to help them succeed, they add.

And they could start next week when Chinese President Hu Jintao visits India for four days from Nov 20 on a trip that hopes to build on a burgeoning economic relationship despite a lack of progress on political disputes.

“Trade has been expanding rapidly ... but at the same time we shouldn't be blind to the difficulties in relations,” said Zhang Li of the Institute of South Asian Studies at Sichuan University in southwest China.

“Trade in itself is becoming a sensitive subject, especially for India,” he said. “We aren't at the stage yet where trade dominates relations and puts other things in their place.”

India and China have come a long way since they fought a brief but brutal border war in 1962 that all but froze their relationship until a thaw began to set in in the late 1980s.

This coincided with India's economic reform programme that was launched in 1991 and led to a surge in bilateral trade: from $260 million in 1990 to nearly $8 billion in 2003 and likely to touch $20 billion in 2006/07 -- far exceeding expectations of the two governments.

Much of this has been fuelled by a huge Chinese appetite for raw materials such as iron ore, steel, plastics and chemicals and Indian demand for electrical and mechanical machinery, mineral fuel, oil, chemicals and silk.

Indian and Chinese companies have also invested in setting up units in each other's territory, although the investments are paltry when compared to overall trade.

The growth has come with its share of problems, which political analysts and business leaders say the two countries may have ignored initially as they were blinded by its rocketting pace.

Indian firms that have done business with China also accuse some Chinese companies of offering better products to Western markets like the United States and low-quality output to Asian countries such as India.

Besides, a large-scale counterfeit industry is allowed to push cheap but low quality or fake consumer products that can force Indian products out of the market, they say.This, says Kapuria, reflects China's poor record of protecting intellectual property rights.

Beijing too has its own list of woes.

New Delhi, it says, is blocking Chinese investment in areas such as ports and telecommunications citing national security concerns, denying Chinese firms big business deals in the public sector, making it tough to get visas, and not being responsive to a free-trade agreement proposal.

“It is very frustrating,” said a top official of a Chinese telecoms firm, who did not want to be named as he is not authorised to speak to the media.—Reuters






Previous Story Top of Page

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006