Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

October 25, 2006 Wednesday Shawwal 1, 1427


Humans living far beyond planet’s means: WWF


BEIJING, Oct 24: Humans are stripping nature at an unprecedented rate and will need two planets’ worth of natural resources every year by 2050 on current trends, the World Wide Fund (WWF) conservation group said on Tuesday.

Populations of many species, from fish to mammals, had fallen by about a third from 1970 to 2003 largely because of human threats such as pollution, clearing of forests and overfishing, the group also said in a two-yearly report.

“For more than 20 years we have exceeded the earth’s ability to support a consumptive lifestyle that is unsustainable and we cannot afford to continue down this path,” WWF Director-General James Leape said, launching the WWF’s Living Planet Report.

“If everyone around the world lived as those in America, we would need five planets to support us,” Mr Leape, an American, said in Beijing.

People in the United Arab Emirates were placing most stress per capita on the planet ahead of those in the United States, Finland and Canada, the report said.

Australia was also living well beyond its means.

The average Australian used 6.6 ‘global’ hectares to support their developed lifestyle, ranking behind the United States and Canada, but ahead of the United Kingdom, Russia, China and Japan.

“If the rest of the world led the kind of lifestyles we do here in Australia, we would require three-and-a-half planets to provide the resources we use and to absorb the waste,” said Greg Bourne, WWF-Australia chief executive officer.

Everyone would have to change lifestyles — cutting use of fossil fuels and improving management of everything from farming to fisheries.

“As countries work to improve the well-being of their people, they risk bypassing the goal of sustainability,” said James Leape, speaking in an energy-efficient building at Beijing’s prestigious Tsinghua University.

“It is inevitable that this disconnect will eventually limit the abilities of poor countries to develop and rich countries to maintain their prosperity,” he added.

The report said humans’ ‘ecological footprint’ — the demand people place on the natural world — was 25 percent greater than the planet’s annual ability to provide everything from food to energy and recycle all human waste in 2003.

In the previous report, the 2001 overshoot was 21 percent.

“On current projections humanity will be using two planets’ worth of natural resources by 2050 — if those resources have not run out by then,” the latest report said.

“People are turning resources into waste faster than nature can turn waste back into resources.”

RISING POPULATION: “Humanity’s footprint has more than tripled between 1961 and 2003,” it said. Consumption has outpaced a surge in the world’s population, to 6.5 billion from three billion in 1960. U.N. projections show a surge to nine billion people around 2050.

It said that the footprint from use of fossil fuels, whose heat-trapping emissions are widely blamed for pushing up world temperatures, was the fastest-growing cause of strain.

James Leape said China, home to a fifth of the world’s population and whose economy is booming, was making the right move in pledging to reduce its energy consumption by 20 per cent over the next five years.

“Much will depend on the decisions made by China, India and other rapidly developing countries,” he added.

The WWF report also said that an index tracking 1,300 vertebrate species — birds, fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals — showed that populations had fallen for most by about 30 percent because of factors including a loss of habitats to farms.

Among species most under pressure included the swordfish and the South African Cape vulture. Those bucking the trend included rising populations of the Javan rhinoceros and the northern hairy-nosed wombat in Australia.—Reuters

The most wasteful

THE following is a ranking compiled by the WWF of the 10 nations whose inhabitants place most demands per capita on the world’s natural resources.

(1) United Arab Emirates

(2) United States

(3) Finland

(4) Canada

(5) Kuwait

(6) Australia

(7) Estonia

(8) Sweden

(9) New Zealand

(10) Norway.—Reuters






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006