Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

August 05, 2006 Saturday Rajab 9, 1427


Prosecutor terms US troops war criminals


TIKRIT, Aug 4: A military prosecutor branded four US soldiers who have been accused of murdering Iraqi prisoners ‘war criminals’ on Friday and demanded they face court martial.

The prosecutor, Captain Joseph Mackey, was speaking on the last day of a legal hearing to determine whether there is enough evidence to prosecute the troops following the May 9 slaying of three detainees.

“US soldiers must follow the laws of war. That’s what makes us better than the terrorists, what sets us apart from the thugs and the hitmen. These soldiers did just the opposite,” Mackey said, in his closing argument.

The defendants, he charged, had cut the prisoners free of their plastic handcuffs and then ‘murdered them in cold blood’, later falsely claiming that the victims had escaped and assaulted their captors.

“For this, they’re not war heroes, they’re war criminals, and justice states that they face trial,” he concluded.

However, civilian defence lawyers acting for Private Corey Clagett, Staff Sergeant Raymond Girouard, Specialist William Hunsaker and Specialist Juston Graber, insisted that the prosecution had failed to prove its case.

Clagett’s counsel Paul Bergrin told the tribunal that military prosecutors had failed to produce any eyewitness testimony or forensic evidence to prove that the Iraqis had not been lawfully killed.

Prosecution witnesses had given inconsistent statements, he and other defence counsel alleged, and had all bar one said that they did not believe that the defendants were men capable of premeditated murder.

“They went in to a hot LZ (landing zone) with the pre-thoughts they they’re going to fight terrorists, al-Qaeda insurgents. Every single one of them followed their mission and their rules of engagement,” Bergrin said.

The hearing ended and the panel of officers retired to decide whether the defendants — air assault troops from the “Rakkasans”, the 3rd Brigade of the 101st Airborne Division — ought to face trial.

Their conclusion will be passed to the commander of the 101st, who will announce his decision in the coming days.—AFP






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006