Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather


FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

July 20, 2006 Thursday Jumadi-ul-Sani 23, 1427

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




PPP to contest non-bailable warrants against Benazir, Zardari



By Our Reporter


ISLAMABAD, July 19: Leader of Opposition in the Senate Mian Raza Rabbani Wednesday said that the non-bailable warrants issued by the district and sessions judge, Islamabad, for the arrest of PPP Chairperson Benazir Bhutto and her spouse Asif Ali Zardari would be challenged.

“The lawyers of the former premier have proceeded to London and on their return they will challenge the orders of the district and sessions judge, as he has no jurisdiction to issue non-bailable warrants of Ms Bhutto and Mr Zardari,” said Rabbani in a statement here on Wednesday.

“It is totally unlawful for the district and sessions judge to issue non-bailable warrants of Ms Bhutto and Asif Ali Zardari”, he added.

He said according to the law, the sessions judge lacked jurisdiction to entertain a case relating to filing of electoral assets with the Election Commission of Pakistan.

The complainant in the mis-declaration case is the National Accountability Bureau, which has failed to act against a single minister of the incumbent regime for the last seven years, he said.

The PPP leader said that NAB lacked power or authority or locus standi to file a complaint of this nature. “It is the Election Commission that can take cognizance of a mis-declaration if it has been committed,” he added.

However, to date, the Election Commission has not filed any such case against any individual except for the former prime minister and her husband, whose assets are a correct formulation.

The purpose, he said, for which the assets had been filed had also lapsed. The purpose was to consider whether a person could contest an election or continue in a particular assembly. The assembly for which the election form was filled had completed its term in 1996, a decade ago, he said.

The mis-declaration case is time-barred, malafide and without jurisdiction, he said, adding that the judge was bound to issue summons at the known address of the defendants, which he did not do.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006