|
|
|
| July 06, 2006 | Thursday | Jumadi-ul-Sani 9, 1427 |
Rivals serve up another classic
BERLIN, July 5: It was always unlikely that Germany and Italy would reproduce their seven-goal 1970 spectacular but Tuesday's semi-final has already earned its own place in the World Cup's gallery of masterpieces.
In Mexico 36 years ago Italy emerged 4-3 winners for the dubious honour of becoming Brazil's sacrificial lambs in the final but this year the prize at stake was a place in a very winnable decider against France or Portugal.
It also offered the chance to secure a fourth victory since both sides had lifted the trophy three times previously.
The size of the reward could have strangled the match with tension but instead it was the best of the tournament so far and another reminder that a shower of goals are not always necessary for a classic as Italy won with two late strikes in extra time.The game was memorable for all the right reasons.
It was played at a relentless pace, with supreme technical mastery, expertly and sympathetically refereed, featuring risky but positive substitutions by both coaches and settled in dramatic fashion with two beautiful goals late in extra time.
“It was the best match that I've seen in a long time,” said former Germany great Franz Beckenbauer, echoing the thoughts of locals and neutrals from around the world.
The atmosphere in the Westfalenstadion was electric before kickoff as the 65,000 crowd prepared to witness a titanic battle between two tournament greats who both fully believed they were the better side with neither willing to give any ground.
They were not disappointed as the match started at breakneck speed and barely paused for breath over the next two hours.
In contrast with much of the cagey, slow-burn football that had been on display throughout the last four weeks, Tuesday's match was a fantastic advertisement for attacking football.
As soon as each side won the ball they set about trying to find a way forward. But this was no kick and rush, no hurried, hopeful long balls to the front men — it was considered, sharp passing, agile movement, thrust and counter-thrust.—Reuters
|
|
|
|
