Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

July 03, 2006 Monday Jumadi-ul-Sani 6, 1427


Congress can pass new law for prisoners’ trial: senators


WASHINGTON, July 2: The US Congress is ready to craft legislation to prosecute Guantanamo war-on-terror prisoners after the government’s plan for military trials was rejected by the Supreme Court, top senators said on Sunday.

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told the Fox News Sunday television programme that Congress could conceivably pass a new law allowing the government to try the prisoners by military commissions by September.

“The court is telling the administration go back to the Congress, work with the Congress,” Graham said.

“I intend to sit down with the administration ... to come up with a process that holds terrorists accountable, to give them a fair trial, but to make sure that if they did do the things that we’re alleging, they’re fairly punished,” he said.

“Every enemy prisoner, terrorist, is entitled to be tried in a military commission format, not civilian format.”

The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the administration of President George W. Bush had no authority under US laws and the Geneva Conventions to set up military tribunals without the backing of Congress to try detainees held at a US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The ruling cast doubt on Bush’s robust assertion of presidential power for national security purposes since the September 11, 2001 attacks, and bolstered Congressional claims that they have the power to regulate White House-directed programmes from the handling of detainees to conducting secret surveillance on US citizens.

But Democratic Senator Jack Reed told Fox News that the minority Democrats are likely to cooperate with Republicans and the White House to pass the legislation enabling detainee trials. “This has to be a process where we understand and recognise that we have to have a legitimate procedure — legitimate in the eyes of the court, legitimate in the eyes of the American people, that we can move quickly to try these individuals and do justice,” Reed said.

“And I think that’s something that will come together in a bipartisan basis, I hope, in a deliberate and quick fashion, and do that.”

Graham, himself a former military prosecutor, said that Congress holds the power to establish military tribunals.

“The court is saying to the president, ‘you can have a military commission, but since it comes from the Uniform Code of Military Justice, a congressional statute, you’ve got to go back to Congress’.”

Republican Senator John McCain said on ABC television’s This Week programme that new legislation for Guantanamo trials would likely fall under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the military legal system.

“I think that it shouldn’t be exactly the same as applied to a member of the military, but it’s a good framework. And I don’t think that the Supreme Court said it had to be exact.”

But Graham said he disagreed with the court’s ‘breathtaking ruling that Guantanamo prisoners had to be treated fairly based on Article III of the Geneva Conventions, holding that stateless fighters like members of Al Qaeda don’t deserve Geneva protections.

“The question for this country is, should Al Qaeda members who do not sign up to the Geneva Convention, who show disdain for it, who butcher our troops, be given the protections of a treaty they’re not part of?” he said.

“My opinion, no. They should be humanely treated, but the Geneva Convention cannot be used in the war on terrorists to give the terrorists an opportunity to basically come at us hard without any restrictions on how we interrogate and prosecute,” Graham argued.—AFP






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006