Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

April 1, 2006 Saturday Rabi-ul-Awwal 2, 1427


Training of Iran troops could harm N-deal: US lawmaker tells India


WASHINGTON, March 31: India’s alleged training of Iranian troops could dampen vital US Congress support for a bilateral landmark civilian nuclear deal, a ranking Democrat warned on Thursday.

Tom Lantos, the top Democrat on the House of Representatives’ powerful international relations committee scrutinising the nuclear deal, expressed concern to visiting Indian Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran over New Delhi’s training of the Iranian navy, the lawmaker’s spokeswoman Lynne Weil said.

“Congressman Lantos pointed out that episodes of conflict in relations between US and India, such as India’s early wavering in its commitment to refer Iran to the UN Security Council and more recent concerns raised about Iranian troops receiving training from India will only undermine Congressional support for the deal,” she said.

Reacting to the concerns, the Indian government said two Iranian naval ships with about 200 personnel were on a six-day ‘informal’ visit to the southern Indian naval base in Kochi in March while on an annual sea training sortie in the Arabian Sea.

The port call was essentially ‘diplomatic-goodwill’ and not part of any training package, said Venu Rajamony, spokesman for the Indian embassy in Washington.

He said the Iranian ships ‘interacted’ with the Indian Navy as part of the visit, adding that activities included courtesy calls on Indian naval officers, navigational simulation and recreational activities such as yachting.

Tom Lantos and Shyam Saran discussed the US-Indian nuclear agreement in the larger context of bilateral relations ‘which they agreed are blossoming in many respects’, Ms Weil said.

But Mr Lantos noted that ‘at a time when gestures from allies are significant — not symbolic gestures alone but substantive gestures — the Indian government should look for opportunities to make gestures that underscore the strength of the bilateral friendship’, she said.

Lawmakers are reportedly sceptical about giving their mandatory approval to the nuclear deal as India has refused to sign the NPT and has developed nuclear weapons on its own.

Mr Saran warned on Thursday of a setback in US-India ties if Congress refused to ratify the nuclear deal, clinched on March 2 by President George Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Mr Saran, the top civil servant in the Indian foreign ministry, said the public focus of the envisioned strategic partnership between the two nations had been on the nuclear deal even though bilateral relations covered many key areas.

“If this does not go through, it does not mean that everything else will fall by the wayside but at the same time we should also recognise that for good reason or bad, there is intense focus on this particular agreement,” he said.

“Therefore whether we like it or not, this has become very symbolic of what we want to do with India-US relations.”—AFP






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006