Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

November 26, 2005 Saturday Shawwal 23, 1426

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




Nawaz Sharif’s plea against income tax fixed



By Our Correspondent


LAHORE, Nov 25: The Lahore High Court registrar office on Friday fixed before Justice Nasim Sikandar as an objection case a writ petition through which former prime minister Nawaz Sharif has challenged a decision by the local income tax commissioner of re-opening his case.

The court is first to decide on Nov 30 if the writ petition is maintainable because the registrar office has repeatedly been returning it to the former prime minister’s counsel, Advocate Tariq Aziz, saying it was not maintainable.

The income tax commissioner re-opened the case of amount payable by Mr Nawaz Sharif during 1997-98 and imposed a tax of about Rs4 million, which also included a huge penalty. The commissioner took the decision about two years back but withheld the order that was communicated to the family only in August this year.

Advocate Tariq Aziz filed the writ petition challenging the re-opening of the case in September. Since then the registrar office has been returning the petition with one objection or the other.

The counsel said he had told the office that it was court and not the office to decide if the petition was maintainable or not. He also cited the high court rules, which envisaged the returning of petitions only on technical grounds.

He also told the registrar office that it was raising one objection after another and this was illegal.



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005