Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

September 23, 2005 Friday Sha'aban 18, 1426

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




PHC upholds capital punishment: Murder of 12-year-old boy



Bureau Report


PESHAWAR, Sep 22: The Peshawar High Court on Thursday upheld the death sentence awarded to a person by an anti-terrorism court for sexually assaulting and killing a boy. A two-member bench comprising Justice Shahjehan Khan Yousafzai and Justice Fazalur Rehman Khan observed that the prosecution had proved its case against the appellant, Naseebzada, and the evidence on record proved his involvement in the commission of the offence.

The appellant was convicted on Dec 14, 2004, by the anti-terrorism court in district Swat, and was sentenced to death with a fine of Rs100,000.

The boy named Naseeb Zaman, aged 12, was a student of class three at a local school in Lower Dir.

The prosecution claimed that the boy disappeared on Dec 7, 2002, from his village. The family suspected that Naseebzada was responsible for the boy’s disappearance. Soon after the occurrence, Naseebzada and his family had left the area.

Later on, the police arrested the man on Dec 16, 2002, and on his indication the police recovered the body of the boy from a dry well. During police investigation, the appellant claimed that he sexually abused the boy and as he was saying that he would inform his parents about the incident, he killed him out of fear of reprisal.

He stated that he blindfolded the boy and pushed him into the well.

The appellant retracted his statement before the court of judicial magistrate and stated that he was going along with the boy at night and he fell into the well. He could not justify why he remained silent when the boy fell into the well.

The prosecution claimed that earlier the family of the victim had reprimanded the appellant as he was trying to establish friendship with the victim.

Barrister Arshad Abdullah appeared for the complainant whereas Waseem Tariq represented the state. They contended that the appellant had pointed out the place from where the body of the victim had been recovered. They added that the boy was missing and finally he was found dead.



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005