Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker
Horoscope

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

May 25, 2005 Wednesday Rabi-us-Sani 16, 1426


Germany opposes moves to refer Iran issue to UN


UNITED NATIONS, May 24: Signs of a split between the European Union’s three biggest powers have emerged on the eve of nuclear talks with Iran, with Germany opposing British and French preparations to take action against Tehran at the United Nations, European diplomats said on Tuesday.

The foreign ministers of France, Britain and Germany meet Iran’s top nuclear negotiator, Hassan Rohani, in Geneva on Wednesday to press Tehran to maintain a freeze of activities that could be used to develop nuclear weapons.

The trio warned Mr Rohani earlier this month that resuming any activities related to uranium enrichment * a process of purifying fuel for * nuclear power plants or weapons – * would prompt them to refer the case * to the UN Security Council for possible economic sanctions.

European diplomats close to the talks said French and British officials had already begun preparatory work on a proposal to refer Iran to the council at next month’s meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency if Tehran restarts any enrichment-related work.

Germany, a major trade partner of Iran, supports the EU position that Tehran must terminate its enrichment program.

But it does not like the idea of an automatic referral if the Iranians resume enrichment-related activities, all of which Iran suspended in November under a deal struck in Paris with the EU trio, or EU3.

“Germany’s position is still cessation (of enrichment) but it’s hesitating on the second step – Security Council referral,” a diplomat from an EU3 country said. “Berlin doesn’t want any ultimatums or automatic referrals. That is where Germany differs from France and Britain.”

Sharing Washington’s suspicions that Iran’s nuclear program is a front to develop weapons, the EU trio has offered Iran economic and political incentives if it gives up its enrichment program permanently. But Iran refuses to abandon it and has expressed frustration at the slow pace of talks with the EU.

UNIFIED FRONT: Despite Germany’s dislike of an ultimatum for Iran, EU diplomats familiar with the German position said the trio would present a unified front at the Geneva talks as they all attempt to pressure the Iranians to back down from threats to resume work at a uranium processing plant at Isfahan.

Earlier this year, EU3 diplomats said French President Jacques Chirac had pressured his negotiators to soften their stance on Iran, but they said the French team has maintained its position that Tehran must give up its enrichment program.

Iran has so far held off from officially notifying the IAEA of its intention to resume work at Isfahan, but Tehran insists the decision has been taken and it is just a matter of time.

In order to prevent the talks from collapsing, EU diplomats said France, Britain and Germany could show flexibility over a proposal that Russia enrich uranium for Iran temporarily.

David Albright, a former UN weapons inspector and director of a US think tank, said Germany, with its high unemployment rate and sluggish economy, has strong reasons to hesitate about a Security Council referral that could lead to sanctions.

“The problem for Germany is that if there are sanctions, they take a bad hit at a bad time,” Mr Albright said.

Germany is the biggest exporter to Iran. In 2003, it exported to Tehran goods worth 2.7 billion euros.

Mr Albright added that Iran would be wise to strike a deal now before Germany holds early elections in the fall, when conservatives are expected to replace Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder’s Social Democrats.

“I think they would get a better deal from (Foreign Minister Joschka) Fischer and Schroeder than from a different government,” Mr Albright said.

He said the conservative Christian Democrats would likely take a harder line on Iran’s nuclear program to help mend ties with Washington, which were damaged by Mr Schroeder’s opposition to the invasion of Iraq. —Reuters



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005