Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story


7 April, 2005 Thursday 27 Safar 1426



US troops holding Iraqi women ‘hostage’


BAGHDAD, April 6: The US military in Baghdad confirmed on Wednesday it was holding two Iraqi women and was investigating accusations that they were being held hostage to pressure their fugitive male relatives to surrender.

A spokesman said the women were detained as ‘insurgent Suspects’, not hostages. The latter would be a breach of international law, human rights experts say; it could, however, be legitimate to hold relatives as suspects in their own right.

“The US army and Iraqi police did detain two females suspected of collaboration with anti-Iraqi forces,” Major Donn Latimer said, using a term employed by US troops to describe guerillas.

“Evidence was found at the residence that indicates clear knowledge of an intent to harm coalition forces,” Major Latimer said.

“Currently their disposition is under review.”

The women’s names were not available but details of their detention indicated they were relatives of Arkan Mukhlif al Batawi, who has accused US troops of taking his mother and sister hostage after raiding the family home on Saturday.

Mr Batawi, who farms at Taji just north of Baghdad, said on Tuesday that the women had been arrested to try to pressure him and his brothers Muhammad and Saddam to surrender themselves to US troops who suspect them of carrying out attacks.

A handwritten note in Arabic at the house read: “Be a man, Muhammad Mukhlif, and give yourself up and then we will release your sisters. Otherwise they will spend a long time in detention.” It was signed ‘Bandit 6’, apparently US army code, possibly designating a company commander.

Several neighbours corroborated Mr Batawi’s account of events.

When a newsman called a mobile phone number left on the note, an American who said he was a soldier appeared to be aware of Mukhlif Batawi’s accusation but declined further comment.

‘THOROUGH INVESTIGATION’: Major Latimer said the US military was investigating accusations that the women had been detained to pressure the brothers.

“We will conduct a thorough investigation into this matter,” the spokesman said. “As such we cannot comment further.”

Neighbours interviewed around Mr Batawi’s villa in the capital’s Sunni suburb of Taji corroborated his account.

They said US troops accompanied by Iraqi police had arrested Mr Batawi’s 65-year-old mother and a sister who is 35, and had told locals through an interpreter that the women would be freed only once the brothers surrendered themselves.

Mr Batawi, who spoke to newsmen on Tuesday at the offices of a leading organization for Sunni ulema, said he was released in August after more than a year in Abu Ghraib jail following the US invasion. He denies helping the guerillas.

On several occasions, Iraqis have accused US troops of arresting women to pressure male relatives into giving themselves up. Amnesty International says such arrests would be in breach of international law. The US military says it only detains those suspected of crimes or involvement in attacks.

The detention of women in any circumstance angers many Iraqis who say it violates their culture. Sunni ulema have demanded the two women arrested in Taji be freed immediately.

“We condemn this act, taking women hostage to pressure families to hand over relatives,” said Adnan al Dulaimi, head of Iraq’s Sunni Endowment, which supervises shrines and mosques.

“We call for the immediate release of these women to avoid any consequences that could take place.”

Mr Batawi said he was not sure why the troops wanted to arrest him and his brothers but believed they might suspect them of involvement in guerilla attacks on US forces. —Reuters






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005