Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV 2 Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story


March, 22 2005 Tuesday 11 Safar 1426



Talks with CA at an impasse: union chief


SYDNEY, March 21 Australia’s cricketers’ union said on Monday negotiations with Cricket Australia over distribution of games revenue had reached an impasse.

Australian Cricketers’ Association chief executive Tim May said talks between the ACA and Cricket Australia were at a stalemate after the CA board of directors rejected a proposal endorsed by the respective organisations CEOs.

May said talks had reached a critical stage as CA continued with efforts to dilute the players’ share of the games revenues.

Under the current memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the two sides, players receive 25 percent of Australian cricket revenue, with the governing body seeking to reduce the players’ share to 23 percent.

May said despite making significant progress during negotiations with CA chief executive James Sutherland, proposals developed in conjunction with Sutherland had been rejected by the CA board.

“The ACA has at all times approached these negotiations with the intention of balancing the interests of the game with those of the players,” May said in a statement released on Monday.

“We believe that our rejected proposal properly reflects such balance.

“To achieve this balance, the players have committed in excess of $2 million (US1.58 million) from the player payment pool to be dedicated to junior cricket development.

May said the head body had rejected the goodwill gesture from the players’ association.

“The present players have taken team performances and the value of cricket’s major revenue streams to unsurpassed levels in this country,” he said.

“It is disappointing that CA seek to ‘reward’ the players contribution by reducing the players share of the games revenues.

“Such actions hardly act as an incentive for players to grow the game revenues and satisfy and support sponsor initiatives.

“Other sports in Australia continually attempt to make their sports more attractive to elite athletes yet it appears that cricket’s governors are doing their best to dilute the attractiveness of playing the game at its elite level,” May said.

The players’ advocate said that based upon ACA projections, CA and its state associations at June 30 this year will have accumulated profits in excess of over $80 million (US63 million).

“Despite significant increases in revenue projected for the next MOU, Cricket Australia and its state associations continue to mount an argument that the game cannot afford player payments,” May said.

“The ACA and its members deserve more respect. Cricket Australia should extend a spirit that is based upon respect for ones opponents to the negotiating table.”

May said in the statement that the ACA has demanded that the Cricket Australia board revisit their position regarding the player payment pool as a matter of priority to ensure that negotiations can be successfully completed prior to the expiration of the current MOU on June 30 this year.

CA public affairs general manager Peter Young said CA remained confident a resolution would be reached before the mid-year deadline.

“As far as we’re concerned the MOU discussions are going well. We just need a little bit of time for checking with our stakeholders,” Young said on Monday.

“We’re very conscious about our timelines on this and are keen to resolve it ahead of those timelines.

“We’re very focused on that and there’s a lot of detail still to be discussed and agreed.”

—AFP



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005