It could have easily passed for an amusing irony had the circumstances not been tragic, even ominous.
Professor John Keane of the University of Westminster was speaking last week in Delhi about the ancient grassroots democratic tradition of India, possibly comparable in time with ancient Greece.
Even as the learned professor was lauding the historical role of India in fostering democracy through many a challenging century, some typically murky political events were unfolding in Bihar, Jharkhand, Goa and Haryana, all important states, all trying to set up new governments by patently unfair means.
India, so spoke Prof. Keane, had successfully shored up a dying democratic tradition also more recently when totalitarianisms of different varieties all but destroyed parliamentary democracy in Europe by about 1945.
"The credit for its rejuvenation goes to the lonely experiment in India under Jawaharlal Nehru's leadership."
Tall claim. Felt good. But, looking out of the seminar window, how were we to explain the totalitarian threat stalking the world in the garb of democracy today, in Iraq or Gujarat, for example? How should we explain the murder of smaller democracies by the biggest democracy, keeping the examples of Allende and Mosaddegh in mind? What about the neo-fascist threat in Nehru's India itself?
This is where the insidious sub-text of the political turmoil in the four states, three of them the result of inconclusive poll verdicts, becomes chilling.
The BJP has ruled Jharkhand since its inception, and now the February polls booted it out. A similar inconclusive verdict showed the door to Railway Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav's party, which had ruled Bihar for around 15 years.
While in Jharkhand the BJP returned as the single largest party, in Bihar it was Mr. Yadav's Rashtriya Janata Dal that came first. According to the rules that brought in the first Vajpayee government in 1996, the BJP should have been asked to form a government in Jharkhand, while giving a similar opportunity to Mr. Yadav in Bihar.
After all in 1996, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee was made prime minister on the grounds that the BJP had got 179 seats, emerging as the largest group in parliament but with no hope of getting any support from the others. But that election had for the first time left the Congress behind as a poor second with just 140 MPs.
Not too many want to remember this figure because of its links with Narasimha Rao-Manmohan Singh team's much touted economic reforms, a holy cow as it were. In fact few want to recall that since 1996 the Congress tally in the Lok Sabha, with or without Sonia Gandhi, has hovered just over 140, not once crossing 145 in the 543-member lower house.
Thus the seriousness of the Hindutva challenge to the Congress-led secular coalition has become a strangely masked fact, a truly menacing fact. We could glean it from the figures of last year's general election. The BJP got 138 seats, but the Congress did not get too many more - just 145.
At a time when the burgeoning Indian middle class wants to be told about the glorious democratic traditions of India and about the vibrancy of its electoral system, as Prof. Keane observed, it would seem callous to spoil the party.
Yet it serves no purpose at all to hide the fact that India is perhaps the only democracy in the world where elected representatives are hidden by their leaders in pokey hotel rooms out of the reach of civilization, because the opposition could poach them.
Aircraft were grounded and searched by politicians in Jharkhand in the hunt for some missing unattached deputies whose help was needed by both sides. One deputy was paraded before the president of India in an ambulance because he was too sick to raise his hand in support of anyone. And so he blinked his eyes. And yet this buffoonery is not where the threat to India's secular democracy seems to come from. After all the biggest loser of them all was the one who had stalled BJP president Lal Kishan Advani's chariot ride to Ayodhya. Lalu Yadav, then chief minister of Bihar, also remains the only leader after Indira Gandhi to arrest Mr Advani.
Much of the threat to the Congress and also to the Indian state really lies in the BJP's ability to convert an adverse situation into an ideological asset to shore up Hindutva.
Take the example of a little-discussed cartoon drawn by the BJP to depict the farce played out in Jharkhand. The caricature published on BJP's website shows Syed Sibte Razi, the state's governor, torching the voluminous Indian constitution.
Mr Razi had evidently unfairly installed in Jharkhand a pro-Congress government supportive of the Congress, the party to which he once belonged.
But the BJP's caricature was crafted with another purpose. It showed a picture of Dr B.R. Ambedkar on the cover of the constitution and it depicted the governor in the attire of a north Indian Muslim. Ambedkar who is regarded as the main author of the constitution was a Dalit, and here a Muslim governor was seen burning his book, the constitution of India, to cinders.
This is the way fascist propaganda works. This is the way Dalits and tribes-people, the Adivasis, were used in Gujarat to target Muslims and Christians. This is the way Hindutva groups such as the BJP and Vishwa Hindu Parishad have been using the divisive approach elsewhere too, including in Jharkhand.
The strategy works at two levels. Since Dalits and Muslims were the bulwark of the Congress for many years, dividing their ranks and keeping them in a state of mistrust tackles the key objective of keeping the Congress perpetually weakened.
At another level, the ploy to pit Dalits and Adivasis against Christians and Muslims injects animus, which can be converted at will into a controlled bloodbath at the lower levels of the Hindu society by targeting the minorities as main quarry. This eminently suits the purposes of Hindutva fascism.
It aims to not only blood new storm troopers at the lower levels of India's varied hoi polloi, it also enables the movement to spare upper crust leaders the need to do the dirty work. Hindutva needs a clean image for the likes of Atal Behar Vajpayee. But everyone is too busy tarring the face of the Congress and Sonia Gandhi to notice that.
* * * * *
We have all heard many hilarious versions of George W. Bush jokes. People like Michael Moore had turned it into a fine art to evoke a hearty laughter from their understated but extremely snide wit. Last week Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez came up with a new one. At a news conference in Delhi, which he turned into a Fidel Castro-like lecture against global imperialism and the need to fight the likes of President Bush, he said: "His lies about Iraq were like the man who came home with his face covered with lipstick marks and who told his wife that he had been kissed at the circus by the clown."