The 10-year sentence handed down by a US military court to army reservist Charles Graner Jr. for abusing and torturing Iraqi detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison outside Baghdad, one hopes, will not be the end of the story.
In fact, ever since the prisoner abuse scandal surfaced last year, the focus of the charges and prosecution have been on Abu Ghraib's military guards, most of whom serve the US military in low-level positions.
Notwithstanding the fact that pictures of the abuse seemed to suggest that some of the perpetrators of the torture actually seemed to be enjoying what they were doing, all the soldiers accused of prisoner abuse took the plea that they were merely following orders of superior officers.
Also, from what Mr Graner said at his own trial and what the other soldiers accused of torture and abuse have said so far in their defence, the question seems to be not of superior officers overlooking or tacitly condoning what was going on at Abu Ghraib but rather of actively encouraging torture as an integral part of the interrogation process.
So, what needs to be investigated further is whether such abuse had the sanction of top decision-makers in the US government. Accusations by rights groups that the torture at Abu Ghraib was part of a broader policy of dealing with detainees anywhere and had parallels in Afghan jails and Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, need to be probed.
Unfortunately, recent developments in America tend to lend credence to the view that this issue might be shoved under the carpet with Mr Graner's conviction.
The expected confirmation as attorney-general of Alberto Gonzales, who as a lawyer for the White House publicly called the Geneva Conventions "obsolete" and "quaint" and who had a key role in the formulation of a US Justice Department memo which sought to allow the president to authorize torture as part of the interrogation process, does not leave much hope for those who rightly insist that the level of official complicity and/or approval of the Abu Ghraib torture must be investigated. Until then it would not be wrong to think that Mr Graner is the Pentagon's scapegoat.
Relocating bus terminals
The death of three transport workers in Karachi on Monday as a result of an explosion that occurred when a bus was being repaired needs to be thoroughly investigated. The accident occurred at an illegal bus terminus located in the centre of a densely populated residential area.
Police say that the casualties would have been much higher if the incident had occurred during the rush hour when hundreds of schoolchildren pass through the area. The accident brings into focus the mushrooming of illegal bus terminals in the city and the government's inability to remove them.
While the city government has started work on building new terminals for inter-city buses which are located on the outskirts of the city, the bigger challenge would be to make these transporters move to the new locations.
At present, large buses are seen entering the heart of the city where illegal bus terminals have been set up. Huge tracts of government and private land have been encroached upon for this purpose.
Residents who live in these areas complain of noise, pollution and the presence of unsavoury characters. It is believed that the terminals are operated with the connivance of the area police.
These buses are also a source of pollution and cause congestion on city roads. The rash driving of buses has resulted in several accidents in the past. It is time the government took notice of the bus terminals and shut them down.
The authorities have been saying that terminal points of inter-city buses will be located on the outskirts of the city. Only when this happens will we see an end to this nuisance which continues to grow.