Seminars can be either unbearably dull or so highly learned and pedantic as to exceed the attention span of even serious listeners.
The seminar on Fata was a happy and refreshing exception to the rule - both in substance and in animated audience participation. The two-day seminar was organized by the Area Study Centre (Russia, China and Central Asia) of the University of Peshawar in collaboration with the Hanns Seideal Foundation.
It brought a sizeable mix of - mainly the Waziri, Ahmad Zaid and Mehsud - tribal representatives to the fore in a markedly uninhibited and spirited exchange of views with their metropolitan counterparts. Language was no barrier as English to Pashto / Urdu, (and vice versa), translation and summaries followed every presentation as required.
The tribal speakers projected their case with unexceptionable frankness and responded to fellow speakers at length and with a good deal of gusto. Besides the welcome and keynote address, some 14 papers were readout, ranging from the socio-economic conditions in Fata, to the continuance of the black Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR of 1901); the impact of Afghan affairs on the tribal areas and politico-military analyses of the military operation in Wana and elsewhere in tribal territory.
There was a focused discussion on the prolonged, ongoing Wana operation, The collective tribal response was one of anger and frustration over the "length and intensity" of the operation. The representatives would bitterly complain against the abrupt U-turn in government policy towards the Mujahideen and the Taliban.
Malik Qadir Khan, a fiery tribal chief from the North Waziristan Agency, pointedly spoke of the time when the government would have the tribals treat Mujahideen from Kashmir and Afghanistan as their brothers "in the noble tradition of Ansar-e-Madina."
Mustering his native sense of humour, Malik Qadir Khan said that those of them who had more than one wife were supposed to divorce and give her away in marriage to the incoming warriors. He went on to say that if he had given away one of his wives to a mujahid, she would have been branded today as the spouse of dahshat-gard (terrorist).
Yet another tribal chief from the agency, Malik Gulabat Khan, spoke in the same strain on the same theme. The sudden shift in government policy towards the tribal areas and the subsequent military operation, had left the tribes in a state of shock. That was besides the losses they suffered physically and materially, in life and land.
Maulana Noor Mohammad and Inayatullah Mahsud from the South Waziristan Agency, spoke on the plight of the Mahsuds singled out specially for harsh treatment by the authorities. It is to be noted that while the Waziris and Ahmad Zais have practically made it up with the government, the Mahsuds, supposedly the toughest and the most recalcitrant of the lot, remain pitted against the authorities.
The overall impression gained from the impassioned presentations of the tribes was one of extreme dissatisfaction, despair and protest over the military operation. They, the Mahsud presenters, in particular, waxed eloquent on their role as freedom fighters under the British and as peaceful citizens of Pakistan. It was anything but fair to question their patriotic credentials and to launch military operations in their areas, they contended.
The periodic cross-border forays by the US forces into Fata, accidental or deliberate, also came in for criticism. The Angoor Adda and Lowara Mandai excursions were quoted as examples of American excesses from amongst many such incidents.
Whether the Pakistan army was operating "alongside" or "jointly" with the US forces was also deliberated. It could be either way. But it would be hard to deny that the army and the para-military Frontier Corps remained a part of the US-led coalition forces engaged in the "global war" on terrorism.
Therefore, the distinction between operating alongside and jointly would be purely technical. As for air operations, the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) like the Predator and, where necessary, warplanes tended to show little respect for the inviolability of Pakistan's air space.
The suggestion to carve out a province in Fata elicited a fiery response from the floor. That would in practical terms, amount to wrenching the tribal areas away from the NWFP - something utterly unacceptable. The Frontier people and the government would not even hear of it.
Dr Minhajul Hassan, in his paper on the "Afghan Impact on the tribal Area," dwelt at length on the havoc the concentration of the Afghan refugees in the Frontier and Balochistan had played with the socio-cultural mores of the people and the ecology of the areas. Some of the major damage done included deforestation, the emergence of "Sunni" madressahs spreading jihad ideology; the spread of deadly infectious diseases, the hijacking of vehicles, drugs and arms smuggling and rising land prices (etc.).
On the sidelines of the conference, there was much talk about the lack of coordination between the civil and military establishments. The civilian establishment headed by the governor would go its way, when necessary, even if it crossed the military's path.
What is to be noted about Fata, is that except for sporadic tribal flare-ups every now and then Fata had been by and large, a zone of peace and tranquillity. That is in spite of such disruptive moves and signals emanating from Afghanistan as the Pushtunishtan movement and the erratic interpretations of the status of the Durand Line as the internationally recognized Pakistan-Afghan border.
Only recently, its status was questioned having completed its allotted span of a 100 years. The fact is that the status, having been fixed in perpetuity, is above question. Barring instances, our tribesmen have firmly stood by the federation as patriotic Pakistanis.
Integral to the NWFP, Fata is not yet a part of the province. It remains an anomaly much in the same way as the Northern Areas of Azad Kashmir. Neither exactly is a part of the federation or under the Constitution.
- The writer is a retired brigadier of the Pakistan Army.