Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV 2 Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story


11 September 2004 Saturday 25 Rajab 1425


Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




SC to re-hear plea against meal serving at marriages

By Nasir Iqbal


ISLAMABAD, Sept 10: The Supreme Court will re-hear on Monday a constitutional petition to revise its earlier judgment of lifting ban on wedding meals and wasteful expenses on matrimonial functions.

A three-member Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, Justice Javed Iqbal and Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar will re-hear the case in which Attorney-General of Pakistan, Advocates-General of Punjab, Sindh and the NWFP would also appear.

Since the former chief justice Sheikh Riaz Ahmed could not sign the detailed judgment, the case will be reheard on technical grounds. Now the entire proceedings would be re- adjudicated by a new bench of the Supreme Court.

A consortium of leading caterers, restaurant owners and poultry farmers had challenged the ban on serving food and claim that the ban was against injunctions of Islam.

The respondents on the other hand had argued that the ban was needed to contain wasteful expenses and to help easy and simple marriages for middle class and poor families who badly feel the pinch of such extravagance.

The Supreme Court on Nov 8, 2002, had allowed serving of meals at valima and other marriage functions when the ban to this effect was challenged before it. The court had declared as null and void the promulgation of Marriage (Prohibition of Wasteful Expenses) Ordinance 1997, introduced by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif as an austerity measure and described it as ultra vires to the Constitution.

The top court had also ruled that such a legislation was a provincial subject falling in the concurrent list and therefore the federal government had no power to enact a law, banning the serving of food at valima receptions and allied functions of a marriage.

The court had also held that the provinces would be at liberty to promulgate any such law, fixing the number of guests and showing of dowry. Soon after the judgment, the Punjab government allowed one dish at valima receptions with the restriction of number of guests, while in the other three provinces marriage functions have become a wasteful practice due to non-legislation.

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2004