President Musharraf has appealed to Pakistanis to project their country's and society's "soft face" and to present a modern and progressive version of Islam to the rest of the world.
It is important that the outside world is reassured that Pakistan is not a country whose inhabitants favour a Taliban version of Islam or where foreigners are unwelcome. By and large, this means that we should be proud of our faith and our beliefs but, at the same time, be tolerant of people who might have a worldview or faith different from our own.
This also means that we should not seek to force our values or religious beliefs on others and do not indulge in a game of 'my faith/culture/religion is better than yours'.
We should avoid labelling people whose religious beliefs we disagree with as 'kafirs' or speaking derisively about their views. This is important not only to correct our image abroad, but for our domestic tranquillity, stability and progress.
The problem is that there seems to be a disconnect between what the president is saying (and this isn't the first that he has spoken out in favour of moderation and a progressive outlook) and what his own government does on many benchmark social issues, especially those affecting women and the minorities.
Members of parliament, including some from the government side, have managed to stall for the time being a government proposal to modify the Hudood laws to make it easier for the state to intervene on the side of a female victim in case her family is inclined to forgive the accused.
They have done this despite the well-documented fact that every year hundreds of women are killed on the pretext of tainting family honour after which, in many cases, the murderers (usually close relatives of the victim) do not even have to face trial because the relatives of the victim deem it fit to 'forgive' them.
Then, in one province, the administration's meagre official resources are used to draw up a province-wide plan to cajole the faithful to pray, as if the faithful do not already know what their faith demands of them.
The police are also used to round up teenagers frequenting Internet cafes, an indication that the province's government believes that the greatest technological marvel of our times is in fact the devil's handmaiden and leads young minds astray.
In another province, a senior bureaucrat in charge of the administration of the provincial capital seems to have no pressing civic issue to deal with than to check 'vulgarity', which he intends to do by ordering the installation of cameras inside the city's theatre halls. The president's plea is good and timely, but will he and his government take the lead in taking actions that lend Pakistan a "soft face"?
Banning blood banks
The Sindh government's decision to close down unregistered blood banks in the province is somewhat arbitrary. While there can be no two opinions on the need to shut down units found guilty of flouting the provisions of safe blood legislation, taking such drastic action against all blood banks operating without licence has serious implications for patients in urgent need of transfusion.
It would, perhaps, be more realistic to issue final notices to blood banks that have not so far registered with the Sindh Blood Transfusion Authority, making it incumbent on them to do so by a given deadline. In the event of non-compliance, the health authorities should go ahead and take steps to discontinue their services.
Given that blood-borne diseases like Hepatitis 'B' and 'C' and AIDS are on the rise in the country, one hopes that the government's resolve to act on the issue is not short-lived, and that the health department continues to keep stringent checks on the province's blood banks.
This is important because without regular inspection of blood products, even those units that have registered with the relevant authority could lapse into unethical practices and provide unscreened, contaminated blood to patients.
Perhaps, the health department could also consider subsidizing the cost of high quality screening kits and of other facilities needed for blood storage in order to ensure maximum safety of the blood products.
The public, too, should be made aware of the risk associated with transfusions of unscreened blood, and the importance of voluntary donation should be stressed upon to discourage professional donors. Many of the latter comprise drug addicts whose use of shared needles renders their blood particularly risky for transfusion.