Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV 2 Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story


25 June 2004 Friday 06 Jamadi-ul-Awwal 1425






Govt refuses to withdraw increase in water bills

By Our Staff Reporter


LAHORE, June 24: The government has refused to slash the increase in water bills. Housing and Urban Development Minister Raza Ali Gilani said if the increase was not allowed water and sanitation agencies in various towns would go bankrupt and resultantly close down.

Replying to an adjournment motion of MMA's Dr Waseem Akhtar about a 40 per cent hike in Lahore Wasa charges, he said the power tariff had been increased by 222 per cent during the last five years but there was no increase in water tariff.

The minister said consumers had been provided some relief by reducing sewerage and water connection fees from Rs4,500 to Rs500 and Rs300 respectively. MMA's Arshad Baggu claimed that provincial authorities had written to the Sialkot Wasa, which had increased its water charges by 250 per cent, that it was allowed to increase the charges even by 2,000 percent for its survival.

Dr Waseem regretted that the minister was trying to complicate the issue by giving unnecessary figures. The government must not think like a businessman on every subject as it is supposed to make a deficit investment in the social sector, he said.

He suggested that Wasa could re-introduce high connection fees, check water pilferage through unmetered connections and take other administrative measures to improve its financial health instead of overburdening consumers in one go.

The speaker did not allow further discussion on the issue saying the purpose of an adjournment motion was to draw attention of the government to a specific problem and the objective had been achieved.

Deputy opposition leader Rana Sanaullah contested the chair's ruling, arguing that the whole exercise would prove futile if the objective was limited to just drawing attention of the government to the problem.

"There should be something more to it than this," he insisted. The chair said it was not necessary to solve an issue within the house only. It could be settled outside as well, the speaker said while disposing of the motion.




Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2004