Tribal militant Nek Mohammad's death in a missile attack by security forces brings to an end the drama that began with the famous "Shakai embrace" on April 24. Even though the events preceding the surrender at Shakai and the subsequent military operations had a larger dimension, Nek Mohammad was its central figure. On April 24, he had surrendered to the security forces along with five other wanted men and had promised to live in peace. As part of the bargain, the government later released 50 prisoners.
However, immediately after the surrender, differences arose over the terms of the agreement. Nek insisted he never promised to surrender foreign terrorists hiding in the Wana area. He said that foreigners living in South Waziristan were passing normal lives and were not involved in any terrorist activity. The government, then, accused him of a breach of faith and went after him.
Honour and promise have a special place in a tribal society. For that reason, Nek lost the sympathy of many tribal elders. In fact, despite having an array of modern electronic devices - as claimed by the military spokesman - the security forces could not have kept track of his movement without some tribesmen's cooperation. His death in a village on Wana's outskirts may constitute a victory for the security forces, but that does not end the problem for Islamabad.
Terrorists loyal to Al Qaeda are very much there in the tribal area, and only an uninterrupted pursuit of the problem can produce results in the long run. This means that the government should place as much emphasis on political means as on military. Al Qaeda still has sympathizers in the tribal belt, but the tribesmen's cooperation for getting hold of them can be won by economic and political means.
The tribesmen should be made to realize that Al Qaeda and foreign militants were involved in acts of terror, violence and subversion in Pakistan and that the victims of their terrorist activity were often innocent Pakistanis. They must be told that such criminal offences in no way serve the cause of Islam or contribute to this country's peace, progress and stability.
Housing societies
Rawalpindi Development Authority's action in serving legal notices on the eighteen illegal housing schemes to cease operations immediately is unlikely to be welcomed by the people who have already invested their hard-earned money in these schemes.
The question arises as to why, if they are illegal, did the authorities not stop these housing societies much earlier when they were launched rather than waiting until they have already collected money from unsuspecting investors. Similar action had also been taken earlier in Islamabad against dozens of such housing societies, putting the investment of hundreds of families at stake.
The fact that such private housing societies have mushroomed over the years and that many people are willing to invest in these schemes is indicative of the demand for housing in the twin cities on the one hand and the authorities' failure to meet that demand on the other through schemes of their own. In this respect, the federal government's new housing strategy announced in mid-April is a welcome move.
As a corollary to this there must be firm action against land grabbing that is common in urban areas. But until this new strategy begins to bear fruit in the form of adequate housing for the needs of citizens, it is unfair to punish people, who have invested in what has now been declared as "illegal" private housing schemes.