Details are now beginning to emerge as to what caused contamination of the water that was being supplied to Hyderabad, resulting in the death of 13 people over the past two weeks.
Investigative reports in the press make it plain that the Manchhar lake is the source of the deadly water supply. The Sindh irrigation department customarily releases saline water from the lake into the Indus river before the beginning of the monsoon season every year.
The problem arose this year because of inadequate inflow of fresh water in the river downstream from Sukkur barrage. Had the inflow been normal, the Manchhar water, though highly toxic, would have become diluted and harmless by the time it reached Kotri barrage from where Water and Sanitation Agency normally pumps it out to Hyderabad.
The irrigation department did not warn Wasa of the highly toxic nature of the released water because of the non-existence of coordination between the two departments. Reports suggest that even if such a mechanism existed, given the limited filtering facilities available with Wasa, it would not have been possible to fully sanitize the highly toxic water and make it fit for human consumption.
There are a few lessons to be learnt from the whole tragic episode. One, a communication mechanism must be put in place between two or more government departments and agencies dealing with water supply and drainage.
Two, the Manchhar lake, which environmentalists have long warned has become an ecological disaster since the drainage into it of the Right Bank Outfall Drain carrying toxic industrial effluents, needs to be rehabilitated by finding an alternative method for safe drainage of the RBOD.
Third, civic authorities need to be prepared to handle emergency situations like the one experienced in Hyderabad in recent days. The loss of life and the spread of water-borne diseases could have been minimized if timely action had been taken by the authorities concerned.
No-Smoking Day
The call by doctors, ahead of World No-Smoking Day on May 31, for a ban on the promotion of tobacco products must be heeded by the government. Faced with strong and effective anti-smoking policies adopted by governments in developed countries, tobacco firms have now shifted their attention in a big way to Third World countries.
The government has decreed a new, more specific health warning which is now to be printed on the front of all cigarette packets, and PIA put a ban on smoking on all its flights. Laws already exist about the sale of cigarettes to underage children, but there is no enforcement mechanism.
Bans on smoking in public transport are equally ineffective. Since there are no consumer laws worth the name or any strong anti-smoking lobby here, it is perhaps only to be expected that tobacco manufacturers will have a field day.
True, some progress in this country has been made in the sense that cricket series are no longer sponsored by tobacco companies and no tobacco ads are aired in the daytime, but a lot more needs to be done to discourage smoking.
Events involving young people such as concerts and sporting events (though not cricket) are often targeted. Public opinion on the issue has yet to develop, and there is obvious need to undertake education campaigns with greater intelligence and vigour. Only a multi-pronged strategy can make events like no-smoking days meaningful.