Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV 2 Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition


26 May 2004 Wednesday 06 Rabi-us-Saani 1425



Defiance rises against strikes in Nepal

By Damakant Jayshi


KATHMANDU: For years, people in the world's only Hindu kingdom have enjoyed a forced day off from work whenever a "bandh" or general strike is called by mainstream political parties or by the Maoist rebels.

Students gleefully welcomed these total or partial work shutdowns, thankful for the unexpected "holidays" that the hundreds of strikes over the last 14 years have brought.

But these days, the signs of defiance against "bandh" that claim to be for the citizens' benefit are growing as the shutdowns continue to deal blows to the nation's economy and psyche.

"How long can I stay indoors?" Bhairab Giri, who was carrying a sofa on his head, asked. "I did my work on Thursday (the last of three-day Maoist strike that ended May 20) as well since my 'sahu' (the furniture shop owner) asked me to carry a cupboard."

"Moreover, I wanted it too, for not doing it would have meant another pay without money," he said. For people like Giri who depend on daily wages, the strikes are a curse, no matter who calls them and whatever the reason for them.

"I really do not know what these strikes are all about. For me, a one-day strike means a loss of about 300 to 400 rupees (4.1 to 5.47 US dollars). I have a question to ask all those who profess to fight on our behalf: Who are they hurting the most with their frequent strikes?"

Many Nepalis defied the latest bandh despite the bomb blasts caused by the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) on May 19, the second day of the three-day strike. The rebels blew up a parked passenger bus near the city's biggest bus station.

At another place, a bomb they left in the back seat of a taxi went off, damaging the vehicle. But instead of being cowed, operators of public transport vehicles had them plying the streets the following day, though the number was nowhere near those running on normal days. Still, the defiance was for all to see.

During the strike, long-distance travel came to a complete halt for fear of running into mines laid by Maoist rebels determined to deter any travel. Their three-day strike was just the latest of the shutdowns, since it was preceded by a two-day "bandh" by the five political parties that have been fighting to restore democracy in the kingdom for the past year.

In April too, there was a one-day "bandh" called by the parties, followed by a three-day closure by the Maoists. But during these strikes, people in the capital and other major cities, by and large, walked to their work. The streets were not crowded like on a normal day, but were not deserted either. Government-run buses were packed.

The Royal Nepalese Army and the police personnel patrolled the streets more frequently than usual, and the home ministry issued a stern warning against any disruption of normal movement.

"We are just fed up with this strike business. It's time for the "bandh" callers to have some kind of introspection on whether they are employing the right means to achieve their end," said Hari Pandey, an executive in a travel agency. "I am not at all surprised at the turnout on the streets despite the threats."

Worried by the rising number of strikes, the business community, especially the tourism sector, wants the Supreme Court to intervene just as it has in neighbouring India.

"Some of my colleagues have petitioned the court, seeking a ban on strikes," says Binod Bahadur Shrestha, president of the Federation of Nepalese Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FNCCI).

However, he realized even if the Supreme Court issued a ban, it would not be effective so long as outlawed Maoist rebels refuse to abide by it. Still, Shrestha said, "If we are all united on this, I am confident it can be done."

The economic losses caused by the strikes to this already impoverished nation are staggering. In just one day of total closure, the economy suffers losses to the tune of over 16 million US dollars, according to Kathmandu Research Centre.

Since the restoration of democracy in 1990, there have been 85 general strikes in both the whole country and in Kathmandu Valley, according to Home Ministry. -Dawn/The Inter Press News Service.




Previous Story Top of Page

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2004