Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV 2 Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition


09 May 2004 Sunday 18 Rabi-ul-Awwal 1425






APNS files review petition before SC


ISLAMABAD, May 8: The All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) filed on Saturday a review petition before the Supreme Court asking to review its earlier order of dismissing the petition challenging The Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) Act 1973.

Filed by senior counsel Hafeez Pirzada on behalf of 25 petitioners, comprising newspaper owners, the review petition contended that there were errors of law floating on record, which justified review of the judgment of dismissal of the constitutional petition.

The review petition said in order to come to the conclusion that whether the case involved any question of public importance or not, the merits of the case should be looked into in the interest of judicial rationality, but the merits of the case while dismissing the case were not looked into at all.

The review said the petition did satisfy tests of public importance laid down by this court in different authoritative pronouncements.

It said there was a direct conflict floating on the surface of the judgment between the concluding paragraph and the finding on merits and unless reconciled it would result in grave miscarriage of justice.

It said the rule of consistency required that the long line and plethora of rules and the judgments of the court on the maintainability of the petitioner under Article 184(3) of the Constitution should have been duly taken note of as was done by the learned judge in the chambers and in any event the relevant portions of the judgment in the case of Benazir Bhutto had been overlooked by the bench.




Previous Story Top of Page

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2004