A veil of secrecy surrounds Tuesday's grenade attacks and the bombing that rocked the Syrian capital of Damascus. The attack took place in city's affluent Mazze district where many embassies and houses of the ruling Baath party leaders are located.
Security forces reportedly tried to corner what they called a group of terrorists after the latter set off a bomb under a car outside an abandoned building that used to house the UN's country headquarters.
A gun battle then ensued between the assailants and the security forces during which the terrorists hurled grenades at the former. Later at night Syrian security forces confirmed that two terrorists and two passers-by were killed in the operation.
Analysts say that the Syrian government usually uses the term 'terrorists' for Islamic militants. There is some logic in this perception because, earlier this month, Jordan foiled an attack on its security services headquarters in Amman which it blamed on Islamic extremists who, it said, had crossed over from Syria.
However, the last time one heard of a crackdown on Islamists in Syria was in the early 1980s, when Damascus said it had wiped out Muslim Brotherhood from its territory. But these are dangerous times, what with the worsening situation in neighbouring Iraq under American occupation and the Israelis intensifying their persecution of the Palestinians.
On the other hand, the fact that only Israel and the US stand to gain politically from any prospects of destabilization of Syria cannot be denied. Since the occupation of Iraq began last year, the US has repeatedly accused Damascus of harbouring militants and fugitives from Iraq.
The action taken against a group of 'terrorists' by the Syrian government on Tuesday may well have come about as a result of American pressure. But this still leaves the riddle of the timing, motive and choice of the target in Damascus unresolved.
New teachers for Sindh
According to the Sindh education minister, the provincial government plans to hire 24,000 teachers. Speaking to a group of students, the minister said that after this measure the "shortage of teachers would be overcome".
One hopes that in its efforts to provide basic education to schoolchildren in the province, the Sindh government will not overlook the very important issue of quality and qualifications when it recruits teachers in such large numbers.
There is a reason why most developed societies treat teachers with respect and place a premium on their training and qualifications. Teachers are role models for their students and trained and properly qualified ones can play a crucial role in increasing the quality of education in a country like Pakistan.
To achieve that end, it is imperative that the recruitment process be transparent, above board and teachers are chosen purely on merit. Regrettably, however, in Sindh's case, various developments have meant that the process has so far not been very transparent.
Initially, the education department insisted on hiring teachers without involving the Sindh Public Service Commission. Later, it allowed representatives of the commission to sit in on recruitment interviews.
Then, stories kept appearing of applicants claiming that they would be chosen provided they paid a bribe. Furthermore, the perception that the process of selecting teachers was guided by factors other than merit was reinforced by remarks in private by certain officials of the education department who seemed to confirm such stories.
The provincial government must ensure that the process of recruiting new teachers is kept transparent and free from any kind of political or other influence and that applicants are selected purely on merit. Sindh cannot afford another exercise in futility, something that will surely set the province's record in education further back.