A large number of diverse individual and institutional shareowners is an essential condition for making the capital markets perform capital formation and provide liquidity and price discovery.
More so, a broad shareowners' base means the rewards and risks of the capital markets would be distributed throughout the economy. A large number of shareowners also acts as a constant pressure on capital markets to raise their standards, particularly in corporate governance.
Despite the importance of a broad base of shareowners, too few people in Pakistan own shares. The objective here is to provide an assessment of the shareowners' base in our capital markets and suggest measures to broaden it.
What is the number of shareowners in Pakistan? Despite the fundamental relevance of this number for policy making, no one knows for sure. There is no database and there has never been a survey done to measure the investor base. Therefore, what we have to rely on is an estimate.
If we simply gross up the number of shareholders in each listed entity at KSE for 2003, including closed end mutual funds but excluding new listings, the number is approximately 1.8 million.
Clearly, this number is subject to multiple counting, as the same person who owns shares in the Hubco could be a shareholder of the PSO, the PTC and so on. There are others who have invested in listed securities through open-end mutual funds.
NIT is the most broad-based mutual fund in Pakistan and it is said to have around 65,000 unit holders.(Open-end mutual funds do not report the number of unit holders) So including ownership through open-end funds would not raise the number of shareowners, direct or indirect, individuals or institutions, beyond two million.
From share ownership surveys done abroad, we know that on the average an individual owns five stocks. This number can be generalized to our capital markets where access to stock market is essentially limited to small areas in three cities.
However, lets be conservative and use a smaller number, 4, i.e. on the average a person is being counted three times in the gross total number of shareholders. This gives us the net number of shareowners, direct or indirect, as 500,000. The adult population in Pakistan is about 75 million. Therefore, not even one per cent of our adult population owns shares.
You may estimate the numbers in different ways but you are unlikely to get figure larger than one per cent. You may adjust this figure for the low levels of literacy and per capita income in the country but the ratio would be still painfully small. The degree of narrowness of our shareowners base cannot be exaggerated. Due to this extremely small number of shareowners, most of the Pakistanis consider our capital markets irrelevant.
Countries in which capital markets contribute to the economy more than a third of the adult population, can own shares. According to share ownership survey done by the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX), 50 per cent of the Australian adults, directly or indirectly, owned shares in 2002.
The number of direct and indirect adult shareowners for USA, Canada, UK, and Hong Kong, are 50, 46, 22 and 20 per cent respectively. (Due to unavailability of data, I could not compare the numbers within developing countries.)
There are a number of reasons behind the narrow investor base in our capital markets. The salient ones are:
(i) The access to stock market is essentially restricted to three cities, Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad where there is a stock exchange and a branch of the Central Depository Company (CDC)
(ii) Due to a weak economy, very few equity public offers have been made and some of the largest companies are still predominantly government owned
(iii) Investor awareness of capital markets is very low even among the relatively educated and high income individuals
(iv) Investors are not offered adequate protection in capital markets. exchanges, despite being front line regulators, have a poor perception and are often called "Satta Exchange", "Rich Men's Club", and "Rigged Casino."
(v) Most of the listed companies are tightly held by owner families to ensure total control.
We have seen that shareowners base is extremely narrow. But is the number growing? In the wake of capital market reforms, soaring share prices, and macroeconomic achievements, one would expect that the number of shareholders in the secondary market would have risen substantially. The data shows that is not the case.
Table 1: Trend in number of shareholders
Company
2000
2001
2002
2003
PTCL
55.462
55.462
52.460
55,868
MCB
51,335
51,001
20,032
48,811
Dew-Sal Fibre
Not Available
17,077
21,064
20,301
Sui Northern Gas
20,593
21,027
20,646
18,466
ICI
23,052
20,531
19,548
17,431
Hub Power
16,999
NotAvlbl
19,456
17,260
Pak PTA
Not issued
20,789
19,273
17,356
FFC Jordan
20,133
19,418
16,627
13,239
PSO
13,721
13,555
13,407
14,439
Askari Bank
11,921
11,592
13,463
12,878
Faysal Bank
12,553
12,125
14,326
12,020
KESC
9,845
10,660
11,579
11,993
Nishat Mills
11,768
11,899
11,344
10,723
Maple Leaf
10,427
11,137
10,368
9,615
Engro Chemical
8,329
9,128
8,624
9,609
Sources: Annual reports: Data as of end Jun/Sep/Dec
If you look at the number of shareholders in the most broad-based and liquid companies from 2000 to 2003 in Table 1, you can see that there is no significant increase. In some of the broad-based closed-end mutual funds, the number has actually decreased significantly, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Shareholders in selected closed end funds
Company
2000
2001
2002
2003
ICP SEMF
11,270
10,951
10,214
9,108
BSJS/Sec./Confd.
6,251
5,565
4,617
4,065
Golden Arrow
3,286
3,353
3,419
3,236
First Capital
2,934
2,781
2,697
2,603
Pk. Premier
1,462
1,229
1,020
1,197
Sources: Annual reports: All figures are as of end June
There is a very simple explanation for this stagnant investor base. For every buyer in a market, there is a seller. While some have entered the market, others have chosen to exit. The only thing that is working in broadening the investor base is the public offers as shown in Table 3. Had it not been for the public offers, our shareowner's base would have decreased despite the price boom.
So what can be done to broaden the investor base? Five broad policy measures are suggested. First, the government needs to continue to privatize state owned enterprises through public offers because this is the only measure that is effectively broadening the investor base.
The offers should be so structured that all investors who apply for the minimum lot get one. In SSGC's public offer 250,000 shareowners applied for shares but only 67,000 could be allotted shares due to the restrictions in the design of the offer.
Second, we need to restructure our markets in the light of international trends of demutualization integration to improve governance and provide greater access to capital for expansion of technological infrastructure.
The trading terminals of stock exchange and the terminals of the Central Depository System need to be made available in cities other than Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad to provide direct access to markets.
At the same time, Stock Exchanges, as front line regulators, and SECP, as apex regulator of capital markets, need to offer greater protection to shareowners from abuse by including good corporate governance practices in its legal framework, having an effective system of handling investor complaints, and demonstrating the capacity to detect and punish market abuse through market surveillance. In the absence of adequate protection, it would be unwise to lure more investors in the capital markets.
Third, investor awareness of capital markets needs to be increased. Through simple televisions programmes supported by other media, investors need to be told about what capital markets are and how can they benefit from it. Most importantly, these programmes should inform the investors of common mistakes that investors make when dealing in securities.
Fourth, the government should so modify the taxes that they encourage investments in listed securities. The exemption of capital gains from tax should be made available for the next five years, rather than renewed every year. Dividends should only be subjected to single taxation by introducing a dividend imputation system, such as the one in Australia. The stamp duty on Term Finance Certificates should be abolished.
Fifth, the exchanges and the SECP have to measure the shareowners' base and the trends among shareowners, make action plans based on this information and then publicly disclose both.
The exchanges and the SECP should arrange investor surveys to find out exactly why they do or do not buy shares and make available a database of shareholding patterns over time. The Asian Development Bank (ADB), the key financier of capital market reforms in Pakistan, would do well to include measuring investor base and conducting investor surveys in its list of conditions for further financing.
The above five steps are likely to result in substantially increased number of shareowners in our capital markets. A broader investor base would bring meaning to our capital markets and make them relevant for common Pakistanis.