An indication of the anarchy in Afghanistan comes from the goings on in Faryab, the country's northern province. The Kabul government asked Anayatullah Anayat, Faryab's governor, to stand his ground as Abdul Rashid Dostum's troops advanced.
However, even before troops loyal to the Uzbek warlord could enter Faryab, the governor fled Meymanah, Faryab's capital, hoping to seek asylum in neighbouring Turkmenistan. The extent of Gen Dostum's power in the northern areas is evident from the way he ordered his militiamen in the neighbouring regions to disarm Mr Hashim Habibi, another warlord.
Mr Habibi was loyal to Gen Dostum but then switched his loyalty to President Hamid Karzai. Clashes then broke out, and his forces entered Faryab. Gen Dostam is now a law unto himself. He was appointed deputy defence minister by President Hamid Karzai but he never went to Kabul and is running a government of his own in the northern region.
Gen Dostam is not the only warlord defying the Kabul government. About 100 people were killed in fighting in Herat last month between warlord Ismail Khan and another favoured by the Karzai government.
It now appears doubtful if the election - scheduled earlier for June - will be held in September. While the registration of voters is in progress, the real task lies in creating peaceful conditions for holding elections.
This is not an easy task. The Afghan national army has not reached the strength where it could tame warlords and restore Kabul's authority, while the International Security Assistance Force has confined itself to Kabul and Kunduz.
In any case, taming the warlords by force will merely mean more bloodshed. Ultimately, President Karzai and his international backers will have to rely on the political process. Historically Afghanistan has been a tribal confederacy in which the provinces were given autonomy in return for loyalty to Kabul.
The Soviet invasion and the subsequent civil war destroyed this balance. If Afghanistan is to have peace again, it may have to revert to some such arrangement between the provinces and the Kabul government.
Bouteflika's re-election
Winning a thumping 83 per cent of the vote in last Thursday's polls, Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika has been given yet another five-year mandate to consolidate the peace he brought to the North African country after his previous election in 1999, and to improve social conditions for his people.
While rival contenders for the presidential position alleged massive fraud, international observers and western diplomats were satisfied with the way the polls were held. Algerians, too, have responded favourably to the results - a far cry from the state of affairs in 1992 when the military blocked the success of an Islamic party poised to win the elections.
The move resulted in eight years of anarchy and violence unleashed by Islamic militants that led to the deaths of 100,000 people. Mr Bouteflika's overtures to the militants and the promise he made of amnesty, following the 1999 polls, have been largely credited with restoring peace to the country.
Mr Bouteflika will now have to prove himself equally committed in other areas. While, of late, Algeria's economy has been improving as the country strives to attract foreign investors, much of the population continues to live under depressed conditions, with a staggering unemployment rate of over 30 per cent and a lack of housing being cited as two major reasons of discontent.
Then there is also the question of tackling a surging Berber nationalist movement, demanding recognition for the Berbers' separate identity or, failing this, outright independence.
Mr Bouteflika will have to ensure that the benefits of an economy that is slowly recovering will trickle down to the masses - both Arab and Berber. Even as he addresses these problems, he will also have to work to strengthen the country's democratic institutions that have been a victim of military interference long after Algeria won independence from the French in 1962.
While this may prove a difficult task, it is of paramount importance as only a stable and democratic Algeria will be in a position to attack foreign investors and rid itself permanently of the stigma of Islamic extremism and military rule.