Blair rules out more troops

Published June 26, 2003

BAGHDAD, June 25: British Prime Minister Tony Blair on Wednesday ruled out sending more troops to Iraq, but admitted at the same time the security situation in the country was “still obviously serious”.

The US overseer in Iraq, Paul Bremer, blamed members of Saddam Hussein’s banned Baath party for the sabotage that he said was responsible for what are now two days without electrical power in Baghdad.

Iraq’s Northern Oil Company said on Wednesday the latest attack a day earlier targeted an oil pipeline northwest of Baghdad that supplies a refinery and a power plant in the capital.

Speaking in the House of Commons after Tuesday’s incident in Al Majar Al-Kabir in which six British soldiers were killed, Mr Blair said he had been told by Chief of Defence Staff Gen Michael Walker that commanders in Iraq felt they had enough troops on the ground.

He suggested that the incident might have resulted from attempts by British forces to disarm Iraqis around the town, which is midway between Baghdad and Basra.

“There had been problems in relation to that, and that may form part of the background to it but at the moment it is simply too early to say,” Mr Blair said.

On Iraq as a whole, the prime minister said: “There are real problems, but there are also real improvements.”

In Al Majar Al Kabir, residents said the six soldiers died in a shootout with local people. Another eight Britons and 17 Iraqis were injured in firefights when the troops were confronted by a crowd of around 300 people.

Locals were angered by British troops carrying out house searches with dogs, one resident said.

Speaking on BBC radio earlier, British Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon said an urgent review was underway into the security of British forces which control southern Iraq.

“Obviously, depending on the results of that review, we have more troops should that be required. We have significant forces available should it be necessary,” he said.

Britain now has 12,000 troops in southern Iraq.

The British had been telling themselves they were handling the situation in southern Iraq better than the Americans holding the centre and north of the country, who have been coming under frequent and deadly attacks from pro-Saddam resistance groups.

The second-in-command of Iraq’s main Shia group, Abdul Aziz al Hakim, last week rejected attacks on coalition soldiers and called instead for “peaceful” resistance.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...
Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....