Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story


May 27, 2003 Tuesday Rabi-ul-Awwal 24,1424

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)



Jadeja’s plea rejected by court


NEW DELHI, May 26: The Delhi High Court on Monday rejected Indian all-rounder Ajay Jadeja’s plea for return to grade cricket in view of BCCI’s petition challenging Justice J.K. Mehra award setting aside five-year ban imposed on him following the match-fixing controversy.

Justice Manmohan Sarin, who had on May 16 issued notices to Jadeja, BCCI’s Investigator K. Madhavan and members of Disciplinary Committee, agreed with BCCI counsel Kapil Sibal’s submission that cricketer’s plea cannot be entertained unless objections to the award were decided.

The court is scheduled to hear BCCI’s objections to the Award on July 8 after respondents file their replies.

Earlier, a Division Bench of the court had on April 24 asked BCCI to consider Jadeja for Ranji Trophy and posted the matter for hearing on May 19.

However, when the matter came up for hearing, the bench sent the petition to Justice Sarin after BCCI counsel Radha Rangaswamy submitted that the award had already been challenged before a single bench.

The BCCI challenged Justice Mehra award on April 25, just two days before it was to become binding. The Jan 27 award would have become final on April 27 at expiry of 90-day statutory period, had it gone unchallenged.

Jadeja accused BCCI of scuttling his selection in Ranji Trophy by faxing a letter to DDCA and advising the latter not to select him.

He was also not allowed to take part in charity match in South Africa as ICC objected to his participation at instance of BCCI, his counsel P. P. Malhotra alleged. — PPI






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005