Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

December 31, 2002 Tuesday Shawwal 26, 1423

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




Board meeting: suspended RCB members request rejected



By Our Staff Reporter


RAWALPINDI, Dec 30: The Rawalpindi Cantonment Board (RCB) has rejected the request of the RCB’s suspended members regarding the convening of a full-board meeting, official sources told Dawn.

In a letter to the suspended vice-president of the board, Chaudhry Tanvir Ahmad Khan, and other members, the RCB has contended that the four-year term of office of the former had ended on July 25, 2002.

“Section 14(5) of the Cantonment Act on the basis of which you have desired for holding a special meeting of the board being members of the former board has been misinterpreted as you are no more members. Furthermore, the board has been varied during the pendency of your term in office which is likely to continue till the successor board is elected under the Cantonment Ordinance 2002,” the letter stated.

“Your request for convening of special meeting of the Cantonment Board merits no consideration,” it added.

On the other hand, the members have strongly reacted against the RCB’s move and termed it a ‘gross violation of the cantonment rules’. They are planning to move the courts.

“Our term has not ended. The cantonment officials are telling lies because the board has not been varied. We are, therefore, going to sue the cantonment officials in the courts,” a suspended member, Haji Ijaz, said.

He admitted that their four-year term had ended, but said section 15 (E) of the Cantonment Act, 1924, clearly stated that the former members would remain in office till new ones were elected to the board.

Haji Ijaz said there were precedents in the RCB’s history when the board, which had been illegally suspended, was restored by the superior court.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005