Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

December 18, 2002 Wednesday Shawwal 13, 1423

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




Judgment in Miani land case reserved



By Our Staff Reporter


ISLAMABAD, Dec 17: The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its judgment on the claims regarding the land under Miani Saheb graveyard in Lahore.

The SC bench, comprising Chief Justice Shaikh Riaz Ahmad, Justice Mian Mohammad Ajmal and Justice Mohammad Nawaz Abbasi, after hearing the counsels from both the parties reserved the judgment.

Arguing on behalf of the petitioners, three Lashari brothers, Advocate Munir Paracha argued that the management committee of the graveyard had encroached the private land of his clients by six kanals.

The Board of Revenue on an earlier complaint from them had prepared mutations of about a parcel of 15 kanals of land and held that six kanals belonged to the Lashari brothers, but despite various courses adopted by the appellants, including a writ petition before the Lahore High Court, the land had not been restored to them.

Advocate Maqbul Siddique, representing the management committee, rejected the claim and said that the so called mutation deed had not been found valid even by the LHC from which they had sought relief under its writ jurisdiction.

The counsel argued that the Lahore deputy commissioner, under the preservation and maintenance of graveyard laws, enacted in 1958, was the chairman of the managing committee and when the first case was made out by the Lashari brothers on the land, one of their brothers was in the office of the deputy commissioner, and at present the same person, he argued, was among the petitioners.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005