Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

November 4, 2002 Monday Sha’aban 28,1423





Sri Lanka, rebels agree to tackle political issues


NAKHORN PATHOM (Thailand) Nov 3: Sri Lankan government and Tamil rebel negotiators ended peace talks on Sunday with a major breakthrough by agreeing to discuss political issues at the core of one of Asia’s longest-running wars.

The four-day talks, the second round of peace negotiations to be held in Thailand, originally expected to deal with humanitarian issues such as demining and refugees in the war-torn north and east.

But the two sides went much further, creating a sub-committee to start looking for a political solution to the conflict in which 64,000 people have died.

“We have been engaged in a violent and brutal war over the last 20 years, so one shouldn’t expect a quick solution,” Tamil Tiger chief negotiator Anton Balasingham told a news conference.

“But since we have engaged in political negotiations in Thailand we have achieved remarkable success in a very short time,” he said, adding that the surprise sentencing of the rebel’s leader to 200 years’ jail in absentia the day the talks began was an irritant but did not affect his resolve.

“Both parties are sincerely and seriously committed to peace and we’ll make every endeavour to see a final and permanent settlement is reached without much delay.”

The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) have been fighting for a separate state in the north and east for the Hindu-majority Tamils, who it says are discriminated against by the island’s Buddhist Sinhala majority.

“We’re working on a political solution, a final solution, where the LTTE can enter into a democratic political framework,” Balasingham said.

“We’ll focus attention on how ethnic conflicts have been resolved by accommodation of ethnic problems in a political system. We’ll be looking at federal and nonfederal models.”

Balasingham and the government’s chief negotiator G.L. Peiris agreed to set up sub-committees to overlook rehabilitation needs in war-hit areas, push military de-escalation as well as examine political questions at the heart of the 19-year-old war.

“DEEP YEARNING FOR PEACE”: The sub-committee looking into political solutions, to be headed by Balasingham and Peiris, may also answer criticism from the opposition in the south who have accused the government of dragging its feet on discussing the main issues with the rebels.

Another sub-committee will deal with urgent humanitarian needs in the north and east, which have some of the poorest areas in Sri Lanka.

It will likely decide on how resources are allocated and what agencies are involved, key questions as many of the needy are living in areas controlled by the LTTE, and could help convince donors to open their wallets when they meet in Oslo on November 25.

The war has left about one million people homeless since it flared up in 1983 as well has put a cap on economic growth for the tropical island off the southern tip of India.

“People have a deep yearning for peace in our country and they realise that is a source from which everything will improve — investment, trade, tourism,” Peiris, who is Sri Lanka’s minister for constitutional affairs, told the news conference.

“Whatever noises are made at the fringes, we will definitely stay our course because we know that mainstream public opinion is behind us.”

The surprise court ruling that sentenced rebel leader Velupillai Prabhakaran for ordering a 1996 suicide bombing that killed nearly 100 people did not damage the positive mood of the negotiators.

Balasingham called the sentence “utterly ridiculous” but did not walk away from the negotiating table.

“As far as we’re concerned both parties have been involved in military operations which can be characterised as acts of war, not criminal offences,” he said.—Reuters






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005