CANBERRA, Aug 2: Australian Prime Minister John Howard warned on Friday that the United States was likely to attack Iraq and Australia would probably be asked to join in.

He also acknowledged that there could be a price to pay but said the “threat posed by Iraq” should not be allowed to go unchecked.

Canberra was conscious that involvement with the United States could produce negative consequences, Howard said.

He did not spell out what those consequences could be, although Iraq has already threatened to halve its Australian wheat imports because of earlier statements in support of a pre-emptive US strike aimed at toppling President Saddam Hussein’s regime.

Howard told a Melbourne radio station that those who advocated an attack took the view that Iraq could acquire nuclear weapons or might eventually use other weapons of mass destruction against Israel or other countries.

“The world will then turn around and say to the US why didn’t you do something about this problem,” he said.

“In the end it is always in Australia’s national interest to see that the threat posed by people like Saddam is not allowed to go completely unchecked.

“On the other hand the country is a long way from Australia and there are some consequences if any military involvement were to take place.”

Military action against Iraq was more likely than not, he said.

“It is likely that if the Americans do decide on military action that they will seek some involvement from Australia,” he said. But he added that Washington had not yet asked Australia for a commitment to military action.

“It is an issue that we have to think about, but it is a hypothetical question at this time.

“The Americans have not made a decision. I know that they have not made a decision. But they are obviously looking at it very closely.

“But just when and in what circumstances and preceded by what I don’t know.”

Howard said he understood the view of those such as Australian diplomat Richard Butler, the former chief UN weapons inspector in Iraq, who counselled caution and only going to war for the right reasons.

Opposition leader Simon Crean said Howard and Foreign Minister Alexander Downer should refrain from sabre-rattling about Iraq for domestic political purposes.

“Any military action against Iraq must be based on clear evidence of Iraqi support for terrorist activity or specific information of an increased threat from nuclear, biological or chemical weapons,” he said.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...
Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....