KARACHI, April 16: When the application of the principal accused in Daniel Pearl murder case, Ahmad Saeed Omar Shaikh, contending that Judge Arshad Noor Khan of the Anti-terrorism Court-III is not competent to try this case came up before a division bench of the Sindh High Court on Tuesday, his counsel relied on article 4 (c) of the Qanoon-i-Shahadat.

The bench comprised the Cheif Justice of the Sindh High Court, Justice Saiyed Saeed Ashhad, and Justice Ghulam Rabbani.

The Advocate-General Sindh, Raja Qureshi, argued that answer to clause 4 was available in section 304 (a) of PPC which pertained to proof of Qatl-i-Amad (premeditated murder).

Counsel Abdul Waheed Katpar, representing the principal accused, has taken a position that in the list of prosecution witnesses the note in the margin against prosecution witnesses 17 to 20 makes the notified judge a witness. He also cited the text of the challan in support of his contention.

The matter was adjourned to April 18.

Opinion

Editorial

GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...
Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...