Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition


December 11, 2001 Tuesday Ramazan 25, 1422

DAWN.com
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)



US seeks use of secret evidence: Illegal immigrants



By Abdus Sattar Ghazali


SAN FRANCISCO, Dec 10: The Justice Department has asked a federal appeals court for a broad ruling to authorize the use of secret evidence in cases in which it is trying to detain or deport immigrants it contends are in the country illegally, it was reported here on Monday. For national security reasons, the government argues that it should share secret evidence with only immigration judges and not with the immigrants and their lawyers, the daily Chronicle said.

Legal experts say that the request and other actions since Sept 11 attacks on New York and Washington DC indicate that the government is moving toward the renewed use of secret evidence in immigration cases, one of the most criticized of the Justice Department’s tactics in recent years.

In the 1990’s, immigrants’ groups and other critics of the secret evidence gained legal and political ground in their assertions that it relegates immigrants to a legal netherworld, having to disprove accusations like whether they have connections to terrorists without knowing specifically what the accusations are.

In a debate during presidential election last year, George Bush sided with the critics of secret evidence. “Arab-Americans are racially profiled on what’s called secret evidence,” Mr Bush said, adding that the government should “do something about that.”

Some immigration lawyers say they have already detected that they are arguing against evidence that they are not allowed to see, the Chronicle reported.






Previous Story Top of Page

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005