Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

November 29, 2001 Thursday Ramazan 13, 1422


Urgent need for democratic govt in Afghanistan



By Rosa Ehrenreich Brooks


LOS ANGELES: With the rapid collapse of Taliban forces throughout most of Afghanistan, many commentators have uncorked the champagne. “War works!” trumpeted the New York Times, and the press is full of pictures of triumphant Northern Alliance soldiers. If the Taliban is finished, good riddance. For years, human rights groups have struggled to call world attention to the Taliban’s brutal interpretation of Islam, and particularly its oppression of women. The Taliban’s support of Osama bin Laden was merely the final straw.

But celebrations are premature. Osama’s terrorist network apparently remains intact. What is more, the continued chaos in Afghanistan poses an ongoing threat to regional stability, to the long-term success of the US “war against terrorism,” and to the rights and lives of ordinary Afghans - especially women.

Ensuring that Afghanistan’s future is less blood-drenched than its past will certainly require a long-term commitment of money and talent, as the United States works with the United Nations to help rebuild the nation’s devastated civic infrastructure. But it may also require us to use force - possibly against our erstwhile Northern Alliance allies - to protect human rights and foster democracy in a post-Taliban Afghanistan.

So far, the US has aided anti-Taliban forces on the apparent principle that the enemy of our enemy is our friend. But the viciousness of Northern Alliance troops during the last decade of Afghan civil war was legendary, so much so that many Afghans - and the US State Department - initially greeted the Taliban’s 1996 takeover with relief. What are the chances, post-Taliban, of lasting gains for Afghan women and civilians? Slim, if we leave it to the Northern Alliance. Some snapshots from the Alliance’s recent past: in 1995, Alliance troops “went on a rampage, systematically looting whole streets and raping women” in parts of Kabul, according to the State Department’s 1996 country report. Witnesses reported that hundreds of women committed suicide to avoid the mass rapes, many by throwing themselves out of high windows. Fahima Vorgetts, an Afghan women’s rights activist, recalls bitterly that Alliance troops treated women as “movable property,” carrying them off as part of the booty of war.

When Northern Alliance forces took Mazar-e-Sharif in 1997, they massacred several thousand Taliban prisoners of war. Some were lined up and shot; others blown up by grenades or drowned in wells. Throughout the war, the Alliance indiscriminately bombed civilian populations, and used children as soldiers and minesweepers. Recent reports of lootings and executions by Alliance troops in Mazar-e-Sharif suggest that little has changed.

The US armed Iraqi president Saddam Hussein as a counter to Iran, only to end up at war with him a few years later. The US gave the Mujahideen who later became the Taliban their most lethal weapons during the 1980s. At one point the CIA even helped support Osama. Getting rid of the Taliban is a necessary but insufficient step in the war on terror. If the US leaves post-Taliban Afghanistan floundering in violence and despair, it will have merely added fertilizer to a breeding ground for terrorists who will one day - with some justice - blame the US and its allies for much of what is wrong with their world. Building a democratic post-Taliban Afghanistan is in America’s self-interest: It is also the only way to avoid shameful hypocrisy. Since Sept 11, US officials have rightly condemned the Taliban’s human rights record, and first lady Laura Bush told the nation earlier this month that “the fight against terrorism is also a fight for the rights and dignity of women.” Now the US needs to show that it means it.

The US should accelerate planning for an interim UN-sponsored government to take charge until Afghan society is capable of sustaining a genuine rights-respecting democracy in which women are full participants. If this means getting tough with its Northern Alliance proxy soldiers, the US should not shrink from doing so if that is the only way to keep them from committing more atrocities.

The lesson from past interventions is crystal clear: protecting human rights and ensuring political stability cannot be accomplished by hand-wringing alone. Sometimes it takes muscle - muscle that goes beyond simply dropping bombs from on high.—Dawn/LAT-WP News Service (c) Los Angeles Times.



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005